Originally posted by DraxusIs it possible to be critical of the current administration in any way and not be classed as 'liberal'?
Yeah, National Public Radio and the Associated Press are slightly liberal, but I've rarely heard anything from them that would be considered political bashing.
Originally posted by treetalkThe only people that classify other people because of their viewpoints are complete morons.
Is it possible to be critical of the current administration in any way and [b]not be classed as 'liberal'?[/b]
With that being said, yes, you can be critical of the administration and not be liberal. Look at Sasquatch for example. He apparently is as far right as you can be and he is still critical of the bush administration.
Of course, being critical of President Bush is the popular thing to do now, so anybody who has a hard time thinking for themselves, despite their political views, is going to be critical of him too. Of course, that is not saying that everybody who is critical is a sheep, because there are a few intelligent voices out there too amongst the rabble.
2 edits
Originally posted by DraxusOh, I quite disagree with you my friend (and I'm not criticizing you personally or trying to make you look bad, just debating here).
Of course, being critical of President Bush is the popular thing to do now, so anybody who has a hard time thinking for themselves, despite their political views, is going to be critical of him too.
The problem that I've seen over the past 6 years is a public that CAN'T think for themselves! Yes, this is why the Bush administration has been able to take over America, torture innocent people and take away rights guaranteed under the Constitution. Because the American people want to believe in their president and are either weak-minded or simply can not think for themselves.
Yes, the facts are there! It's right before all of us. There were no weapons of mass destruction. Iraq had nothing to do with 911, and the list goes on and on and on... but the American people still support this monster.
Originally posted by arrakisHey, we didn't all vote for him..........OK?
Oh, I quite disagree with you my friend (and I'm not criticizing you personally or trying to make you look bad, just debating here).
The problem that I've seen over the past 6 years is a public that CAN'T think for themselves! Yes, this is why the Bush administration has been able to take over America, torture innocent people and take away rights guarante ...[text shortened]... 1, and the list goes on and on and on... but the American people still support this monster.
We're not ALL morons!
Get it right please!
ðŸ˜
1 edit
Originally posted by mlpriorIt's amazing how many people didn't vote for him and yet he's still there. Makes you wonder if the elections are fixed?
Hey, we didn't all vote for him..........OK?
We're not ALL morons!
Get it right please!
ðŸ˜
BTW, they asked Bush if he was concerned about the upcoming elections in November? He said that he wasn't worried at all, that the Republicans would prevail.
Now I wonder about all of this:
* Diebold contributed $100,000 to the Bush campaign.
* After Bush was elected all the voting was changed over to computers supplied by Diebold.
* This system has been suspected of being available to hackers who might get the codes from Diebold... So what's the latest on this?
The security and integrity of the voting process is being questioned after a longtime critic of the state Board of Elections said she received confidential codes that are key to hacking into the computers.
Here's the url - read the story for yourself:
http://www.thewbalchannel.com/news/10124941/detail.html
Originally posted by arrakisArrakis, king of the conspiracy, calling me ignorant? No, actually I know that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Anyone with a brain knows that (What percentage of Americans therefore don't have a brain?). I was making a point about your ridiculing people for believing one thing about 9/11 when in fact you have in the past claimed that the Bush administration had something to do with it. Anyone with a brain knows that isn't true either.
Your sarcasm... or your ignorance?