Originally posted by angie88Seems Mr. Robomod went to sleep and a few folks decided to play around. The Sheriff finally showed up and started deleting posts and handing out fines (bans)....
hmm? why? Are they banned? what for?
I think there may have been a couple others caught up in the excitement, but I'm not sure.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHStrange that you should respond to a "Bowmann post". Don't forget, I accused Bowmann of a 3(a) violation and he has yet to respond. If you're not indeed his other account why do you continue to respond?
[b]It's me or him.
So he is a him![/b]
As to my sexuality, I don't give a rats arse what you may think. I've called Bowmann out on this and to this time he has not sent in an alert. Says it all really.
skeeter
Originally posted by skeeterWell, not to be too technical, but you accused me of being Bowmann, and as such, accused me of having a second account. In the course of such accusation, you also intimated that I am not a man.
Strange that you should respond to a "Bowmann post". Don't forget, I accused Bowmann of a 3(a) violation and he has yet to respond. If you're not indeed his other account why do you continue to respond?
As to my sexuality, I don't give a rats arse what you may think. I've called Bowmann out on this and to this time he has not sent in an alert. Says it all really.
skeeter
If your first accusation is correct, and I am Bowmann, any charges you level at him, you level at me, and vice versa. Therefore, when you yield the point that Bowmann is a man (by use of the pronoun 'he'😉, you are--- in your mind--- acquiescing my manhood, as well.
It's a minor point, to be sure, but I felt it needed clarification, nonetheless.
You are correct in that Bowmann has not responded to your 'calling out' as far as I have been able to ascertain. However, you are incorrect in saying you called him out. You merely accused someone who doesn't even know him (save--- I believe--- one post where he corrected my spelling on 'practising,' and one or two wherein I referenced his grammatic corrections), of being him. To that accusation, i.e., that I am in violation of multiple account abuse, there was a response: from me, in the form of the rejoining posts, and in the form of alerting the moderator, as per your request.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHSpare us the dribble Bowmann. If you have alerted the mods then it's out of our hands. Future posts surely weaken your position. I await the judgement, and there had better be one , for your sake.
Well, not to be too technical, but you accused me of being Bowmann, and as such, accused me of having a second account. In the course of such accusation, you also intimated that I am not a man.
If your first accusation is correct, and I am Bowmann, any charges you level at him, you level at me, and vice versa. Therefore, when you yield the ...[text shortened]... of the rejoining posts, and in the form of alerting the moderator, as per your request.
skeeter (now silent)
1 edit
Originally posted by skeeterFuture posts surely weaken your position.
Spare us the dribble Bowmann.
I disagree. Instead, they are giving you the feeling that--- perhaps--- you may have been wrong. Let's face it: everytime you see my FreakyKBH on that thread, your hands start to sweat.
"What have I done?" you must be thinking,"This guy's clearly not Bowmann! How could I have been so blinded by my overwhelming feelings for him?"
Ironically, it comes down to this: not very many people use anything approximating correct grammar on this site. One can see where confusion may have led you astray.
When the piper comes calling (sorry, if the piper comes calling), I will speak up on your behalf. I will cite the torrent of emotions from your unrequited love for Bowmann as the sand within the oyster, which, tragically, went awry.
They'll understand, because I know I do, as well. Good diction is hard to find, thus your use of the word 'dribble,' when you likely wanted to use 'drivel.' I'm on your side, really.