Another one of my threads deleted? O.k., bracing myself for the next ban then, anytime soon.
It is very suspicious that, since the Boston Lard, with his suspicious
obsession for 'protecting' 13 year olds, launched his crusade, some users
popped up out of nowhere, e.g. Landisqueek, Cheney69, Red Nigh, etc.
Meh, I love playing chess and this site is awesome for that; sadly I also
like a laugh every now and then and find like minded people in the GF. If
someone doesn't like my humor then, well, let them enjoy the lame,
flavorless, passive aggressive, empty spamming of the PC army.
Originally posted by Seitsetotally agree
Another one of my threads deleted? O.k., bracing myself for the next ban then, anytime soon.
It is very suspicious that, since the Boston Lard, with his suspicious
obsession for 'protecting' 13 year olds, launched his crusade, some users
popped up out of nowhere, e.g. Landisqueek, Cheney69, Red Nigh, etc.
Meh, I love playing chess and this site is a ...[text shortened]... well, let them enjoy the lame,
flavorless, passive aggressive, empty spamming of the PC army.
I've had my fights with these pinheads since I joined this site
Originally posted by PonderableThat distinction is in the mind of each viewer. Or has the Academy of
There is also a distinction between "humourous" and "embarassing".
Science issued a criteria?
All in all, when it's about artistic expression, it is better to err on the side
of excess rather than prudence.
It keeps the world moving to push boundaries.
Originally posted by redbadgerIndeed, that implies clarity. But one can call a spade a spade without insulting people.
I like to call a spade a spade.
The first is on the level of factual information, the second is adding a negative valuation and tends to demean.
Every time you insult someone you reveal your character and your value system.