The moment we try to express our soul
through definitions of language so relative,
we lose our meaning in contextual tones,
we lose ourselves through translation.
"words can only describe things of which we can form mental pictures, and this ability, is a result of daily experience."(Heisenberg, Physics and Philosophy)
"The problems of language here are really serious. We wish to speak in some way about the structure of the atoms in ordinary language." (Heisenberg, Physics and Philosophy)
This is strangely true for thoughts as well... things which have no common relation to our "daily experience"
muahaha, nice ones! 😀
Ever heard of Gödel's incompleteness theorm? It basically states that an axiomatic system is flawed by its own logic... and really, all arguments or ideas expressed through language are axiomatic as we assume the listener or reader will understand the language we are using!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_incompleteness_theorem
But, mathematics is not flawed in this way! this is why Heisenberg also said that we were able to describe the motion of atoms and photons using mathematics and not language! he said that matter and radiation (light) are really the same thing, but because they are not so in daily experience we cannot convey them as the same thing with language!
Mathematics comes from experience and language comes from thoughts of experience (or just thought).
Experience is supreme!
Originally posted by ChessJesterI thought it did make mathematics flawed.
muahaha, nice ones! 😀
Ever heard of Gödel's incompleteness theorm? It basically states that an axiomatic system is flawed by its own logic... and really, all arguments or ideas expressed through language are axiomatic as we assume the listener or reader will understand the language we are using!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del's_incomplet ...[text shortened]... ce and language comes from thoughts of experience (or just thought).
Experience is supreme!
Also, what about Bertrand Russell sending a letter to Hilbert, who was in the process of having his book printed on the grand unified laws of mathematics, demonstrating the inconsistency of axiom set theory: timing.