Go back
Must see: police shoot man in back

Must see: police shoot man in back

General

Vote Up
2
Vote Down
-1

@very-rusty said
Are you saying they didn't have a tazer to use?.......I must have missed that part! 😛 🙂

-VR
that is absolutely NOT what i'm saying

you don't read well, do you?

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

@rookie54 said
that is absolutely NOT what i'm saying

you don't read well, do you?
Stop talking in riddles, and make some sense for a change rookie! 😛 😉

-VR

Vote Up
Vote Down

so he* was breaking up a fight between 2 women yet the police were still 'needed'.
defund the police. lol.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@rookie54 said
that is absolutely NOT what i'm saying

you don't read well, do you?
I looked a little further into this story and they say they tried a tazer that didn't work which I find hard to believe.

Lets give them the benefit of doubt and say they did.

Do you really have to put 7 bullets in the mans back?

Now think about him being a white man would things have went down differently?

-VR

Vote Up
Vote Down

And now the victim, who will probably never walk again, is handcuffed to his hospital bed.

Police say it is policy

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@wolfgang59 said
And now the victim, who will probably never walk again, is handcuffed to his hospital bed.

Police say it is policy
It is very difficult to understand how things like this still go on.

They have to review their policy when the man has been shot 7 times in the back.......Absolutely shocking!

-VR