Originally posted by Red NightAgain, you are confusing a baseless claim made over and over and over again by a few posters with an ax to grind with the truth.
thanks as always for bringing us back to reality cash.
"white guy pretending to be black in order to make fun of blacks"
so obvious, so simple, so true
Trashboy and yourself are impervious to reality; you imbeciles actually think pictures of Nazi camp victims are "anti-Semitic"!π
Originally posted by SushillThen you should have just said 'freedom fighter'. Take your own advice. Just because you had a black man as your avatar does NOT mean you are a 'black freedom fighter'.
My avatar was of a black man so the adjective was used correctly, although I would prefer people were all colour blind.
Now answer my question without dodging.
2 edits
Originally posted by no1marauder"I'm sorry that you feel this way. It is to your own discredit if you believe that we take decisions based on the requests of "tiny, irrational and shrieking" minorities - indeed it does appear to me that these words currently apply to your own position.
Again, you are confusing a baseless claim made over and over and over again by a few posters with an ax to grind with the truth.
Trashboy and yourself are impervious to reality; you imbeciles actually think pictures of Nazi camp victims are "anti-Semitic"!π
I'm sure there are many sites where the decisions of the administrators align perfectly with your own opinions.
It was perfectly reasonable to request that this avatar be removed. It is very difficult to debate when people find it difficult to step back and consider very much at all outside of their own immovable opinions but if ever you do want to have a sensible discussion without shrieking, let me know and I'll happily explain our position."
Chris 2009
Originally posted by cashthetrashDo you even go in the spiritual forum? It has so many fundamentalists there that its suffocating.
Why should it be taken down, it's mostly filled with a bunch of Atheists shooting flames at the few Christians there anyway. Maybe the atheists should get their own anti spiritual forum.
And they already have an anti-spiritual forum.... Its called the "science forum" π΅
Originally posted by Red NightIt's too bad Chris lost his temper. But I was hardly being irrational and there's little evidence that I speak for a minority. I sent Site Feedback and tried to discuss the matter frankly and openly; I don't think that deserves a not-so-veiled invitation to leave the site.
"I'm sorry that you feel this way. It is to your own discredit if you believe that we take decisions based on the requests of "tiny, irrational and shrieking" minorities - indeed it does appear to me that these words currently apply to your own position.
I'm sure there are many sites where the decisions of the administrators align perfectly with your o ...[text shortened]... sion without shrieking, let me know and I'll happily explain our position."
Chris 2009
It's also somewhat ironic that he invited me to have a "sensible discussion" regarding the matter and then closed the thread before I could respond. Nor does it help that he has been inconsistent in explaining the rationale behind the decision to remove Sushill's avatar.
I suppose I'm skating on thin ice to publicly question the judgment of the Site Admins on this matter, but I have done so in a respectful manner and made my arguments in a rational way to the Site Admins. If they feel that is unacceptable behavior on their site, so be it.
Originally posted by tomtom232I rarely do for that very reason. I said few Christians. Do you get my drift. I have my doubts about anything Christian with the F word attached. Anyway, your point is noted.
Do you even go in the spiritual forum? It has so many fundamentalists there that its suffocating.
And they already have an anti-spiritual forum.... Its called the "science forum" π΅