Originally posted by Falco LombardiI would not say they are afraid. After all, Tressel has a 5-1 record against them. If anyone should be AFRAID it is Carr. After all, he is faced with the possibility of that record jumping from 4-1 to 6-1 in the same season. Carr has become their own Cooper if you know what I mean. To equal Coopers wasted years of 1-10 against them we only need five more straight wins. LOL.
I meant OSU is AFRAID of Michigan. They wanna play anyone but them!
Originally posted by whodeyCarr is not afraid of playing for the National Championship...He wants to.
I would not say they are afraid. After all, Tressel has a 5-1 record against them. If anyone should be AFRAID it is Carr. After all, he is faced with the possibility of that record jumping from 4-1 to 6-1 in the same season. Carr has become their own Cooper if you know what I mean. To equal Coopers wasted years of 1-10 against them we only need five more straight wins. LOL.
Originally posted by Falco LombardiNotice that I said SHOULD be afraid? Naturally, Carr has already lost and therefore has little else to lose other than losing once more, but the losses to OSU are adding up very quickly and will be forever associated with his coaching legacy.
Carr is not afraid of playing for the National Championship...He wants to.
Lets assume the impossible happens. Lets assume that team up north goes to the big game and wins? They will then have the exact same record, no? Who then is #1?
Originally posted by whodeyMichigan because then they would have won the title.
Notice that I said SHOULD be afraid? Naturally, Carr has already lost and therefore has little else to lose other than losing once more, but the losses to OSU are adding up very quickly and will be forever associated with his coaching legacy.
Lets assume the impossible happens. Lets assume that team up north goes to the big game and wins? They will then have the exact same record, no? Who then is #1?
Originally posted by Falco LombardiBut OSU has already beaten them. You are suggesting we should play a second time to decide the issue so if they each beat each other I could then argue using the same logic as you are now. We need to play 2 out of 3 to really decide who should own the title. After all, how could one team that has the identical record as the other be any worse or better than the other?
Michigan because then they would have won the title.