@wolfgang59 saidAre you the wolfy that has been renamed 'Pious Pouter'?
Funny how it is always you "reading something in" isn't it?
Repeatedly doing it and mis-representing people.
You have been much worse since retiring.
Get a hobby and stop sulking over NZ not letting you in.
-VR
-Removed-Just for the record I agree with what she was saying,
so an ad hominem attack would be rather silly.
Ad as someone pointed out she is a French resident
so entitled to her opinion. I do think she is naïve in
the belief that more democracy will somehow reverse
Brexit though.
But my incredulity was the fact that an actresses opinion
should be on the BBC news.
What do we have politicians for?
@wolfgang59 saidThat is a good point, because Brexit has been going for years now!!! Still not settled either.
What do we have politicians for?
-VR
-Removed-I don't know why I post, or why others post, when you can read minds.
(Albeit wrongly)
However.
1. The thread title was to get attention - what would you suggest it should have been?
(Bearing in mind this is the GENERAL forum and NOT DEBATES?
I would not call myself an ardent defender of the EU but it may well look like that juxtaposed against some Brexiteers.
2. I have (some time ago - even before Brexit) been in favour of a
more powerful European Parliament, one with the power to make
laws rather than just rubber-stamp (or not) laws proposed by
unelected Commissioners. That would be more democratic.
Note: I am not saying that the EU is undemocratic.
(You may have noticed you have an election coming up soon?)
3. I am a passionate REMAINER. That does not mean I think the EU is perfect.
4. Talking of principles -
PLEASE CEASE YOUR CHILDISHNESS OF MISREPRESENTING PEOPLE
@great-big-stees saidLikewise. I particularly learned a lot from the slow-motion running.
Here let me break the silence...when she, Pam, was on Baywatch, I watched but only to get some tips on what exactly was involved in being a lifeguard.