Go back
perfect numbers.

perfect numbers.

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

what's the first one and why?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by windmill
what's the first one and why?
6, because its divisors add up to the number itself.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
6, because its divisors add up to the number itself.
No; they add up to 12.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Freddie2006
No; they add up to 12.
Yes, sorry, I wasn't precise. Its divisors excluding itself.

Vote Up
Vote Down

36-24-36

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by windmill
what's the first one and why?
I thought it was something like 1.608 due to the fact that it occurs in nature so often or maybe I dreamt that.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
Yes, sorry, I wasn't precise. Its divisors excluding itself.
Fair enough.

Vote Up
Vote Down

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_numbers

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mesmiris
I thought it was something like 1.608 due to the fact that it occurs in nature so often or maybe I dreamt that.
Someone's been reading the Da Vinci Code one too many times.

But it's the "golden ratio" ; 1.618

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Freddie2006
Someone's been reading the Da Vinci Code one too many times.

But it's the "golden ratio" ; 1.618

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio
No, they've been reading the DaVinci code 1.618 too many times.

8 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by windmill
what's the first one and why?
1

Because it is. I have spoken.

I should know, I am far from perfect.

Or maybe 3. Or 23. So I heard, anyway. Once. Or twice. I think, if I remember right.

But I might be wrong. And probably am.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by c99ux
1

Because it is. I have spoken.

I should know, I am far from perfect.

Or maybe 3. Or 23. So I heard, anyway. Once. Or twice. I think, if I remember right.

But I might be wrong. And probably am.
Watching you trying to figure out math is like watching Steven Hawking trying to play twister.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Moldy Crow
Watching you trying to figure out math is like watching Steven Hawking trying to play twister.
At least I can spell "maths"...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
No, they've been reading the DaVinci code 1.618 too many times.
Reading it once is bad enough, but wanting to read just over half the book again is beyond me.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lausey
Reading it once is bad enough, but wanting to read just over half the book again is beyond me.
Agreed. I'm not a big book-burning fan, per se, but if there is to be a bonfire anytime soon, that one should be right in the middle.
In a word: tripe.