Go back
randon number

randon number

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
Of course, but that would be cheating.
You have such old fashioned values.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
You have violated the terms of post 6 😠
What term is that! You can't have a favorite number?
Sod off. 😠

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mokko
Sod off. 😠
""
ºº
¿
O

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
You have violated the terms of post 6 😠
But that number's not irrational. A bit argumentative perhaps, but not irrational. And it's not imaginary because I saw it too! Really!😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by reader1107
But that number's not irrational. A bit argumentative perhaps, but not irrational. And it's not imaginary because I saw it too! Really!😏
What number are you talking about? Must have been a group hallucination.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mokko
031075071695021498101104

My favorite number. 😏
this one

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by reader1107
this one
There's nothing there, sorry.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by gollumprawn
thanks for given us some personal information
No problem!

All you've got to do now is guess the other six numbers and you'll be able to phone me at the company I do contract work for in Bracknell 😲

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Daemon Sin
No problem!

All you've got to do now is guess the other six numbers and you'll be able to phone me at the company I do contract work for in Bracknell 😲
Smith numbers (composite numbers, the sum of whose digits equals the sum of those of their prime factors; for example 4) were defined by A. Wilansky, whose brother-in-law's (H. Smith) telephone number 4937775 has this property.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
Smith numbers (composite numbers, the sum of whose digits equals the sum of those of their prime factors; for example 4) were defined by A. Wilansky, whose brother-in-law's (H. Smith) telephone number 4937775 has this property.
Some mathematicians really need to get out more 😕

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Daemon Sin
Some mathematicians really need to get out more 😕
The scary thing is that this is sounding interesting to me! I have students who would absolutely love this!

Vote Up
Vote Down

47.

Duh.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TommyC
47.
A number you should be ashamed of posting.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
A number you should be ashamed of posting.
47?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
A number you should be ashamed of posting.
Quit talking out of your rear ender. 😛


6174 😉😛