Originally posted by sasquatch672I've thrown around some barbs and yes it is fun.
It's alot more fun though to tell someone they should be dragged behind a truck. "Peace and love" isn't very...well, that's all purple ponies and unicorns, innit? Don't you ever get thirsty for a little hate & discontent?
As soon as I do, and I think I've gotten off some good ones without being too offensive, someone like Norlys comes along and calls me a hypocrite!
Basically, if someone debates me, I'll debate them back. If someone crudely attacks me, I'll usually lash back. And if someone bores me with repetitive rhetoric, I'll usually ignore them.
I don't know why others just don't do the same.
By the way, where is that cheesesteak I ordered weeks ago?
Originally posted by sasquatch672I am in total agreement with you.
Come on though. Even taking into account the "RNSOA" thing, RN comes nowhere close to Stang. He is not monotone like Stang, he's not uselessly, needlessly angry like Stang, he will respond to you and argue - in short, while I disagree with him, he took a couple of body blows from me with good cheer and I consider him "jumped in". He's a good forum me ...[text shortened]... n I'm in a bad mood, but mostly that'll be out of me being hung over or in a bad mood.)
Originally posted by reader1107Sounds like a nasty fellow. Glad there is no one like him in the General Forum these days.
This redundant spewer of venom who's now limited to the debates forum I think. He has one topic and one topic only. He's only sorely missed by those with bad aim.
What was his one topic?
1 edit
Originally posted by Red NightHe doesn't like George W. Bush and his war. He might have a few good points but he kept posting the same photo's in several different forums after he was allegedly told by the moderators not to. At least that was my understanding.
Sounds like a nasty fellow. Glad there is no one like him in the General Forum these days.
What was his one topic?