Go back
? Regarding MAP

? Regarding MAP

General

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I was wondering if there was a change in the MAP list in how it is calculated. There used to be a complicated formula that had # of moves divided by 1/2 of time of last move, multiplied by pi/q2 (just a joke), but the list now seems to be based soley on total moves. Kirk

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kirksey957
I was wondering if there was a change in the MAP list in how it is calculated. There used to be a complicated formula that had # of moves divided by 1/2 of time of last move, multiplied by pi/q2 (just a joke), but the list now seems to be based soley on total moves. Kirk
I hadn't noticed that but it looks like you are right Kirk.

David

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Jacko007
I hadn't noticed that but it looks like you are right Kirk.

David
this would also explain why i moved form about 100th in the MAP table to 150th. I thought it was just loads of people moving over the festive season

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kirksey957
I was wondering if there was a change in the MAP list in how it is calculated. There used to be a complicated formula that had # of moves divided by 1/2 of time of last move, multiplied by pi/q2 (just a joke), but the list now seems to be based soley on total moves. Kirk
i just realised that if it was just the number of moves then Rookie5 would still be at 42000 (roughly) moves and he is not in the table.

david