Originally posted by mikelomMy name showed up next to the name of my thread. If you don't like the way I organized my thread, take off.
This is a single thread where you are actually abusing your position.
"needed, separated" ? Rubbish! They could be separated in 1 POST.
You are indeed spamming, which, under TOS, is a bannable offence!
STOP ABUSING your position as a MODerator and Grow up! ðŸ˜
Simple as that.
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitNo matter what reason you want to make for doing it, still called "Spamming"!
I know what spamming is, see my image. Perfect example.
This is a single thread where I happened to NEED to have the links separated so people could respond to each image if they need. (see schakuhr's post)
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitGo inside those threads, and you will REALLY see what SPAMMING is, and PERSONAL ATTACKS, and STALKING, against GB, by the same people over and over again, it becomes a bit of joke after awhile Phlabby.
No, THIS is spamming:
http://www.rhp15.com/pictures/spamming.jpg
Lets not kid ourselves, everyone can see what is going on, and that it is allowed to go on.
1 edit
Originally posted by PhlabibitOh! I see.
My name showed up next to the name of my thread. If you don't like the way I organized my thread, take off.
Simple as that.
P-
So if somebody organises the forum with their name next to everything, you accept that just the same to do you? You wouldn't take off, I presume by your sieve of an answer.
It's becoming quite clear - very clear with your depth of shallowness - that you have one rule for yourself, and one for all the rest.
You don't deserve your position! You really don't!
Edit: And I guess there is no point in alerting your spamming - because you yourself will probably moderate it with your secondary choice of bum chum, won't you!
Originally posted by mikelomQuick, go gather up the rest of the TSM members to attack me and my harmless thread.
Oh! I see.
So if somebody organises the forum with their name next to everything, you accept that just the same to do you? You wouldn't take off, I presume by your sieve of an answer.
It's becoming quite clear - very clear with your depth of shallowness - that you have one rule for yourself, and one for all the rest.
You don't deserve your position! ...[text shortened]... e you yourself will probably moderate it with your secondary choice of bum chum, won't you!
Pathetic.
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitPhlabby, Your thread is completely harmless.
Quick, go gather up the rest of the TSM members to attack me and my harmless thread.
Pathetic.
P-
I was pointing out the "fact" that it was spamming. We all speak fairly well for ourselves, with the exception of myself, and my very poor english, but I do get my point across with it. We don't need a group.
It is not an attack on you, just pointing out that is was spamming.
1 edit
Originally posted by PhlabibitPathetic is that;
Quick, go gather up the rest of the TSM members to attack me and my harmless thread.
Pathetic.
P-
1. You ask me to gather members of a clan I happen to be a member of, as if I need support to make a completely accurate observation of your childish behaviour.
2. You consider that I 'attack' you, when all I do is make a completely accurate observation of your childish behaviour.
3. You consider spamming to be harmless, when your position as a moderator is to prevent it, under the TOS.
4. You yourself, as a moderator, are breaking the site rules yourself.
5. You finish with what you believe to be a clever reply with the word 'pathetic' aimed at me for making a clear observation.
I don't need TSM, nor my own clan nor anybody else to observe a moderator breaking the site Terms of Service.
Demonstrating spamming is not in any way harmless, and it certainly is not the mature action of somebody taken on to moderate site behaviour.
I believe you know better.
Originally posted by mikelomPathetic is an alcoholic wife-beater getting on his high horse.
Pathetic is that;
1. You ask me to gather members of a clan I happen to be a member of, as if I need support to make a completely accurate observation of your childish behaviour.
2. You consider that I 'attack' you, when all I do is make a completely accurate observation of your childish behaviour.
3. You consider spamming to be harmless, when your ...[text shortened]... ature action of somebody taken on to moderate site behaviour.
I believe you know better.