2 edits
Originally posted by SeitseYes its huge, but I prefer a simple redistribution of wealth, no need for liberation theology.
https://panamapapers.icij.org/
Oh joy 🙂
Clap your hands if you dream with the 99% running amok,
rioting, hanging politicians and the wealthy from trees, and
ransacking their houses and properties.
Originally posted by SeitseMob mentality.
https://panamapapers.icij.org/
Oh joy 🙂
Clap your hands if you dream with the 99% running amok,
rioting, hanging politicians and the wealthy from trees, and
ransacking their houses and properties.
All the rich, or just the crooked ones? Anarchy takes the lives of the innocent. Start that ball rolling and you play into the hands of the corrupt. Arrest, prosecute and incarcerate the guilty rich.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhy "redistribution"? Why not just and equitable distribution? And why is it always about money? What about education? Knowledge is power, and the powerful make getting an education too expensive for the poor, continuing the endless cycle of disparity.
Yes its huge, but I prefer a simple redistribution of wealth, no need for liberation theology.
Cap income. Free education. Flat tax.
Originally posted by SeitseIt should not, but People don't do anthing, except to achieve something. Like drinking to quench thirst; sleeping to restore strength; provocing to be seen...
Why should all actions be geared towards any sort of 'achievement'?
Life is not an Xbox first person shooter, you know.
Originally posted by PonderableIf you're a utilitarian, then yes, people only respond to procurement of
It should not, but People don't do anthing, except to achieve something. Like drinking to quench thirst; sleeping to restore strength; provocing to be seen...
pleasure or avoidance of pain.
So, if you want to see it through that glass: it would cause me great pleasure
to see drastic change happening soon, and change takes place evolutionarily
or revolutionarily. This may be an opportunity for revolutionary change.