@the-gravedigger saidIsn’t a point merely an imaginary construct necessary to get the rest of Euclid’s axioms off the ground?
That was my point.
2 edits
@the-gravedigger saidWould you kindly rephrase that in the form of a loaded question, such as, “have you stopped poking your wife with a sharp stick?”?
It can also be a sharp stick.
@fmf saidThis is a pretty good idea. In order for it to be effective though, I'd suggest setting some subject matter boundaries, otherwise this thread will go off in too many different directions.
As a manifestation of our communal belief in the power of asking questions, this thread is for the conducting of a conversation [or conversations] through questions and [therefore] counterquestions only.
@moonbus saidThis is usually the way most threads go! 🙂
Hasn’t this thread already galloped off in all directions?
-VR
@moonbus saidHave you stopped impaling your enemies on a sharp stake?
Would you kindly rephrase that in the form of a loaded question, such as, “have you stopped poking your wife with a sharp stick?”?
@the-gravedigger saidActually I’m just trying to impale you on a sharp stake in our club tournament game. 😛
Have you stopped impaling your enemies on a sharp stake?
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@the-gravedigger saidOh, getting uppity are we? Bananas and apricots not good enough for you?
It can also be a sharp stick.
@moonbus said😀
Actually I’m just trying to impale you on a sharp stake in our club tournament game. 😛
@mchill saidIs there something wrong with starting a thread that will go off in, what you say are, "too many" different directions?
This is a pretty good idea. In order for it to be effective though, I'd suggest setting some subject matter boundaries, otherwise this thread will go off in too many different directions.