I had this brutally rammed down my throat at a tournament on Saturday. I had my opponent's king backed into a corner after having taken the time to kill literally all of his pieces while retainging my queen. Having no king to hand (on the other side of the board), I figured I'd promote a pawn. As I took my hand off the piece, I realized it was a stalemate. There was much banging into the wall of my own head after that.
Originally posted by nathancdu1For "classic" stalemate (one player cannot move any piece including his king to any square that wouldn't involve him moving into check) the game will automatically be declared a draw by the system.
so as far as rules at RHP are concerned, would the decision be a draw or victory?
For more unusual (?) stalemate positions (50 moves without piece take or a pawn move or the 3 exactly the same position rule) there is (I believe) work underway so that the system recognises that a draw should be declared. But in the meantime, if the system does not recognise a stalemate position, a draw should be agreed upon by the players concerned.