Go back
STANG EXPLANATION PETITION

STANG EXPLANATION PETITION

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buffalobill
Yes, I am touchy about these things. If you need reminding, this is first and foremost a chess site. NOT religious and/or political debates. We're not talking threads here, BTW. I couldn't care what happens about the little pr*ck, but I don't want his stuff in my mailbox. Pretty simple, really. He can post what he wants in the appropriate forums, but leave my mailbox alone.
What part about DELETING his PM's didn't you get? I know it's an entire click but that's not tooooooooooooooo much trouble is it? Since your alternative suggestion was to throw the guy, who also plays chess, off the site. Try to get a little perspective, it's not all YOU.

Vote Up
Vote Down

me me me me me me

its all about me.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
What part about DELETING his PM's didn't you get? I know it's an entire click but that's not tooooooooooooooo much trouble is it? Since your alternative suggestion was to throw the guy, who also plays chess, off the site. Try to get a little perspective, it's not all YOU.
Ya know he could take getting any PM as a personal victory. Just think of his excitement.......Oh boy....I gots me a PM....

I bet it was exciting for a little bit anyway.

Cant have it all.

RTh

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Lets face it if he had been really out of order then they would have (& rightly so) terminated his account. But they haven't, so whatever he has done couldn't be that bad. I suspect that the site admin & mods are just being difficult because of his stubborn attitude towards his supposed freedom of speach rights & this sort of campaign that he is running to get people to champion his cause. Personally I'm in favour of letting him back in. I full expect that once things have settled down, site admin will lift the band. It's only a stupid forum afterall & letting him back won't exactly be the end of the world.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trevor33
Even if don't like the guy (I don't know him personally) he/she? deserves an explanation to why he still can't post on the forums

trevor33
maybe some kind of 3a 3b 3c type thing ..... but a little more temporary .....


STANG is like a sniffing dog ...

he sniffs at your crotch and you want to slap him ...

he sniffs at the dog poo on your shoe and you thank him.

i want someone to tell me when i have dog poop stuck to my sole(soul).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
What part about DELETING his PM's didn't you get? I know it's an entire click but that's not tooooooooooooooo much trouble is it? Since your alternative suggestion was to throw the guy, who also plays chess, off the site. Try to get a little perspective, it's not all YOU.
Let's get this straight. I get over 50 spam mails a day in my e-mail boxes and I'm perfectly well aware how to delete mail. I just don't want junk in RHP from someone I don't know, never spoke to nor care about. And it's MY opinion but one I'm sure is shared by many others. Are you saying that general etiquette and the terms of service don't count for anything?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buffalobill
Let's get this straight. I get over 50 spam mails a day in my e-mail boxes and I'm perfectly well aware how to delete mail. I just don't want junk in RHP from someone I don't know, never spoke to nor care about. And it's MY opinion but one I'm sure is shared by many others. Are you saying that general etiquette and the terms of service don't count for anything?
Is he being a jerk? Yes.

Should being a jerk mean you get thrown off an internet chess site? No as it would be awful lonely here.

Since it's no big deal to delete a PM without reading it or to ignore his posts (like I used to do with StarValleyWay's far worse spamming in Debates) , I'm saying "general etiquette" would dictate that he be allowed to stay and post. The TOS is extremely vague in its sections about forum behavior; I'm sure it was meant to be to give the Site Admins maximum flexibility. They certainly have the power to ban STANG or never let him post if they so choose; I'm just saying I think that's a bit of an over-reaction to someone who's merely an annoyance at most.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Is he being a jerk? Yes.

Should being a jerk mean you get thrown off an internet chess site? No as it would be awful lonely here.

Since it's no big deal to delete a PM without reading it or to ignore his posts (like I used to do with StarValleyWay's far worse spamming in Debates) , I'm saying "general etiquette" would dictate that ...[text shortened]... I think that's a bit of an over-reaction to someone who's merely an annoyance at most.
He's a jerk and he plays chess. That's reasonable. Is he any good? 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trevor33
last time i checked he could still pm but couldn't post on the forums, maybe it should be the other way around.
Yes...good point!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buffalobill
He's a jerk and he plays chess. That's reasonable. Is he any good? 😉
Not as good as some of the other jerks here.😀