Originally posted by BusygirlHULK SMASH!
Luckily, GB, I wasn't asking for your opinion on the subject.
Of course your uninvited opinion suggests that women must a.) be imagining something is wrong with them and b.) be stupid enough to think that a tattoo could fix it to be interested in this art form.
While I imagine your intention is to flatter, the result, as usual, is to insult. Why ...[text shortened]... , and the specific nature of my weakness. Be sure to include my "hypersensitivity" in there.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhat a narrow-minded twit you are. Which is fine, of course - you have every right to withhold
No. Ladies interested in disfigurement of their beautiful bodies,
to compensate for some imagined defect, hold zero appeal.
your adoration for only those women who fit within what your definition of beauty is. But to
project your definition of life onto others and then judge them when it doesn't fall into your
simple world-view is what a coward does.
But that's what you get off on, isn't it? You do it all the time. Which is okay. Really, it is. Just
realize that there are some people who can see right through your rhetoric and your prolific use
of other people's ideas (the quote machine) for the blockhead that you often are.
Originally posted by BusygirlBrilliant, girl.
Luckily, GB, I wasn't asking for your opinion on the subject.
Of course your uninvited opinion suggests that women must a.) be imagining something is wrong with them and b.) be stupid enough to think that a tattoo could fix it to be interested in this art form.
While I imagine your intention is to flatter, the result, as usual, is to insult. Why ...[text shortened]... , and the specific nature of my weakness. Be sure to include my "hypersensitivity" in there.
Originally posted by Busygirl"If you enjoyed this post and believe it added value to the Time For Chess forums, then you can bring it to the attention of others by recommending it. Recently recommended posts can be read at anytime from the 'Recommended Posts' option on the forum menu.
Luckily, GB, I wasn't asking for your opinion on the subject.
Of course your uninvited opinion suggests that women must a.) be imagining something is wrong with them and b.) be stupid enough to think that a tattoo could fix it to be interested in this art form.
While I imagine your intention is to flatter, the result, as usual, is to insult. Why ...[text shortened]... , and the specific nature of my weakness. Be sure to include my "hypersensitivity" in there.
You have made 0 recommendation of an available 30 in the last 30 days."
tis now at one. nice post.
Originally posted by BusygirlRec'd!
Luckily, GB, I wasn't asking for your opinion on the subject.
Of course your uninvited opinion suggests that women must a.) be imagining something is wrong with them and b.) be stupid enough to think that a tattoo could fix it to be interested in this art form.
While I imagine your intention is to flatter, the result, as usual, is to insult. Why ...[text shortened]... , and the specific nature of my weakness. Be sure to include my "hypersensitivity" in there.
...and I don't take my use of exclamation marks lightly!
Originally posted by Busygirl"Live and let live, right?" ~Busygirl
GB, my post was not a reply to you but an answer to Eagles question regarding who needs ink. I did use a portion of your previous post only to highlight the fact that it is not only men who enjoy tattoos.
I have had a vision in my mind of an elaborate tattoo I would like for about 5 years now. I want a rose garden with ivy running through it. The ivy ...[text shortened]... but don't be surprised when you offend and insult with your pronouncements and generalizations.
Yes.