Originally posted by no1marauderWarner played in a different time. With Bruce younger. With Marshall Faulk. Yes, Warner has proven himself over Bulger. Currently, Bulger is obviously better. He's a starter on the Rams; Warner's a second stringer behind a rookie.
The last season someone besides Marc Bulger started at QB for the Rams, they went to the Super Bowl. And their defense wasn't much better than it is now. Also, Warner's numbers in that system were far better than Bulger's. Bulger is a middle of the pack QB.
Bulger - I'd put him at #5 now.
Brees, Palmer, P Manning, Romo
Originally posted by RamnedBulger is better than Warner NOW. But Warner played better when he was QB of the Rams then Bulger currently plays. That was my only point.
Warner played in a different time. With Bruce younger. With Marshall Faulk. Yes, Warner has proven himself over Bulger. Currently, Bulger is obviously better. He's a starter on the Rams; Warner's a second stringer behind a rookie.
Bulger - I'd put him at #5 now.
Brees, Palmer, P Manning, Romo
Brees and Romo are flavors of the month. The argument is either P.Manning or Brady until someone else shows they can either consistently play better than Manning in the regular season (and that means years not a few games) or win the big ones in the postseason like Brady does.
1 edit
Originally posted by Natural ScienceWhats wrong with you? I don't believe I commented in any way about you in that post. Do you need help reading?? I really can't see ANYTHING about you there. Where is it! Where does it say 'Natural Science said..."
Nowhere in this thread did I ever say that.
And I'm suprised you want this thread bumped back to the top, considering how much time in it you spent getting faced.
Lord, I beg you to help the fellow.