Originally posted by reader1107thanks, precious seconds wasted reading this thread. (and writing in it 😕)
a meaningless thread. It has deep meaning. In fact, it is probably so profound that you don't understand it. You are thinking *alas, the emperor's naked. Nothing profound here. Nada.*
But you are wrong, my friend! Wrong!
Originally posted by reader1107I'm afraid you're way off, laddie.
So I came up with 105 and 1003, after realizing I'd been trying to come up with a Harshad number. Am I on the right track now?
However, these two numbers share one property. They each have, respectively, the same number of digits as their prime factors.
Originally posted by BowmannThat's what I was trying for this time. There were so many posts on the original thread that I lost track of what a Bowmann Number is.
I'm afraid you're way off, laddie.
However, these two numbers share one property. They each have, respectively, the same number of digits as their prime factors.
(lady or lassie)