Originally posted by apathistRhetorical statements always bite your own bottom!
There are too many people on this planet. Humans are stupid.
-m. 😏
Edit: Then again, you're probably not married, judging by those statements!
You seem to be of the predicate objective type, the predicate
subjective being somewhat more numerous in the environment of a wife.
😀.
Originally posted by mikelomBeen there, done that. You?
Rhetorical statements always bite your own bottom!
-m. 😏
Edit: Then again, you're probably not married, judging by those statements!
You seem to be of the predicate objective type, the predicate
subjective being somewhat more numerous in the environment of a wife.
😀.
The post that was quoted here has been removedYou initially addressed your own change with age with the thought of support, and your positivity, in fighting against the torment of others, which was positive association.
Then your association was back to self, and your feelings.
What happened to the efforts of privilege, and ability?
Is it all that you do that makes your efforts completely futile, and therefore 'feel like crap'?
I know of many disadvantaged, unprivileged or even underprivileged people on RHP who have done wonderful things, in giving, to help moments of despair for others in the world.
Can you associate with the positive, please, and not a head cold?
That would make me warm. 😉
-m.
Originally posted by apathisttwo theses:
There are too many people on this planet. Humans are stupid.
(I) There are too many people on this planet.
(II) Humans are stupid.
To clarify you should define "people" The second thesis somehow indicates that you think that the concept "people" is not limited (does it indeed include?) to humans.
You should further give a criterion on how to estimate the correct number of "people" for the planet (for convinience sake we assume that you write from the same planet as we do).
The second thesis can't be attacked, but it would help to know the threshhold of the properties you would use to define "supidity".
Thank you