Originally posted by Bowmannnot that old chestnut. scottish man moves to england. other person seems unable to reconcile the facts that living in the latter does not preclude expressing opinion on, and indeed defending, the former. or do you think i should just go back to where i came from?
Whose flag? You seem lost to me.
Originally posted by EdwardipovYou sound awfully English to me.
not that old chestnut. scottish man moves to england. other person seems unable to reconcile the facts that living in the latter does not preclude expressing opinion on, and indeed defending, the former. or do you think i should just go back to where i came from?
I was fortunate enough to see "The Moon/Mars Connection" by Richard Hoagland, which sells from www.enterprisemission.com
I saw it three times actually. The first time I saw it I laughed about the absurd statement that there are ancient wrecked dome structures on the moon. Hoagland had pictures of them taken from NASA moon flights, but they were the kind of pictures that if you used a little imagination you could see the dome structures in the background.
The second time I watched that part I realized I had missed some important things that Hoagland had presented. Some VERY important things... Did you know that NASA took hundreds of pictures, yet only a few of them are available to the public?
One of the pictures, Hoagland points out, looks harmless enough, but if you study the picture you realize the experts missed something. It's part of the moon where it looks like a bunch of craters hit... but zoom in on the area and you will see that these are NOT craters! At every location there are two "craters" EXACTLY IDENTICAL! Nature does not make identical patterns of two's on the moon. There is no way they can be natural occurances. Something or somebody made these identical "holes" and they all form a pattern.
There are objects suspended above the moon's surface. And the dome glitters from the sun at the broken locations. Someone was on the moon long before we landed there. 😕