1 edit
Originally posted by StarrmanI know you wouldn't have the mouth face to face!
You doubt I could hold you in contempt? Do you actually know what the word means?
If you don't know what contempt means look it up. You shouldn't use words unless you know what they mean contemptuous one! 😛
EDIT: Too bad we will probably never get the chance to meet in person, would enjoy that meeting!
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYea, just I thought.
I can't think of anything better, so watch me divert attention by something fanciful that seems on topic but really does not answer the main point of your post at all -
Only three means of cognitive perception. Descartes' bottom line conclusion stands as proof the first two can take us only so far.
Pitiful indeed!
3 edits
Originally posted by Raven69You reject the possibility of empiricism and rationalism limitations? Einstein didn't.
Yea, just I thought.
Pitiful indeed!
................
Edit: Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
"I can't think of anything better, so watch me divert attention by something fanciful that seems on topic but really does not answer the main point of your post at all" -Raven
"Only three means of cognitive perception. Descartes' bottom line conclusion stands as proof the first two can take us only so far." -gb
Note: No diversion. Simply answered the question you meant to explore rather than the rhetorical straw man question you asked.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyGB you just don't get this stuff. you clearly don't understand Descartes, you don't understand Einstein, and you probably think 'Kant' is a misspelling of 'Can't'. you are, once again, soooooo out of your depth.
You reject the possibility of empiricism and rationalism limitations? Einstein didn't.
................
Edit: Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
"I can't think of anything better, so watch me divert attention by something fanciful that seems on topic but really does not answer the main point of your post at all" -Raven
"Only three means ...[text shortened]... he question you meant to explore rather than the rhetorical straw man question you asked.
not to mention dishonest. come right out and say that this is a pitch for faith in god, for christ's sake. then take it to spirituality or better yet, sh_i_te ideas.
lightweight.
Originally posted by BlackampYou're probably right. Maybe I'll just tidy up the kitchen, start the dishwasher, brush my teeth, read Psalm 106:15 and call it a night.
GB you just don't get this stuff. you clearly don't understand Descartes, you don't understand Einstein, and you probably think 'Kant' is a misspelling of 'Can't'. you are, once again, soooooo out of your depth.
not to mention dishonest. come right out and say that this is a pitch for faith in god, for christ's sake. then take it to spirituality or better yet, sh_i_te ideas.
lightweight.
..........................