Ok, Misslead, why don't you just express yourself normally? It's your right to talk in riddles and short, stacatto sentences but when you are trying to make a point like this it's incredibly to decipher the meaning and frankly it discourages me from participating....call me dumb or what not but I think it's a bit odd.....😳
- Joined
- 20 Oct 02
- Moves
- 599518
Originally posted by !~TONY~!I think what she is trying to say is she wants the war to start so we can get it over with. Then comes the contradictory observation that every delay is saving lives. Pass the jug............
Ok, Misslead, why don't you just express yourself normally? It's your right to talk in riddles and short, stacatto sentences but when you are trying to make a point like this it's incredibly to decipher the meaning and frankly it discourages me from participating....call me dumb or what not but I think it's a bit odd.....😳
Ah....In that case I agree completely.....I have a feeling Saddam will crumble and his citizens that he brainwashed will join the U.S. once they start to invade.....on the other hand I hate to see U.S. troops die and I also hate to see Bush and Powell pushing this crap through like oxen.....Pass the jug.....🙄
Hey, can I get in on that jug? Anyway, everyone from here to Bangladesh probably already knows I'm very much against the war. On another note, since we are so low on government funds I have to ask: Considering Iraqs standard of living, why don't we just drop rocks out of our planes instead of bombs? Won't it really do the same thing here but cost much less? 😛
there it is again. it all boils down to money. put some of the money spent on armaments towards putting blair and bush before a war crimes tribunal, otherwise the future of the UN is in jepody, especially if the superpowers like america can run roughshod over any international law that they disagree with
Originally posted by ChessNutYes. im sure everyone agrees with this.
Like the one the UN used on Saddam Insane? Give me a break. If there are any criminals around here it's Saddam and all who support him.
But hasn't bush and blair violated interational law through attacking iraq? this could be the end of the UN. the hundreds of civilians who have died in the process would agree with me. All this to get saddam? like i said, the end does not justify the means
On top of this America seems to flout every law they disagree with. the steel crisis, now they're attacking iraq and the latest- bush pushing for the use of chemical weapons!