The only prospect of dynastic union came in the 16th century, when the King of Scotland, James V, married two French brides in succession. His daughter, Mary I, succeeded him on his death in 1542, whose regent was her mother, Mary of Guise, a French noblewoman. She succeeded in marrying her daughter to the child Dauphin Francis, who thus became King of Scotland; when he succeeded as King of France in 1559, France and Scotland were tentatively united in a kind of personal union. Had Francis survived to have a son with Mary, their child would have become king of both France and Scotland
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco%E2%80%93British_Union
What if the son had been born and lived to maturity?
Originally posted by AThousandYoungDeep fried frogs legs?
The only prospect of dynastic union came in the 16th century, when the King of Scotland, James V, married two French brides in succession. His daughter, Mary I, succeeded him on his death in 1542, whose regent was her mother, Mary of Guise, a French noblewoman. She succeeded in marrying her daughter to the child Dauphin Francis, who thus became Kin ...[text shortened]... rg/wiki/Franco%E2%80%93British_Union
What if the son had been born and lived to maturity?
Originally posted by AThousandYoungTheir food would be better, but they would have surrendered to any attacker. 😕
The only prospect of dynastic union came in the 16th century, when the King of Scotland, James V, married two French brides in succession. His daughter, Mary I, succeeded him on his death in 1542, whose regent was her mother, Mary of Guise, a French noblewoman. She succeeded in marrying her daughter to the child Dauphin Francis, who thus became Kin ...[text shortened]... rg/wiki/Franco%E2%80%93British_Union
What if the son had been born and lived to maturity?
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundI've always wanted to go there. Just be glad your not aligned with France pal.
You've obviously never been to Glasgow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6V-QEgYkuVE
It's the murder capital of western europe....no frog gene will change that
Damned surrender monkeys. 🙂
Originally posted by AThousandYoungWe would all speak French Gaelic.
The only prospect of dynastic union came in the 16th century, when the King of Scotland, James V, married two French brides in succession. His daughter, Mary I, succeeded him on his death in 1542, whose regent was her mother, Mary of Guise, a French noblewoman. She succeeded in marrying her daughter to the child Dauphin Francis, who thus became Kin ...[text shortened]... rg/wiki/Franco%E2%80%93British_Union
What if the son had been born and lived to maturity?
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundi dunno, they fight where i live as well, infact i was driving home and there was a huge fight about thirty young people saw one young boy get koshed in the head with a bottle, this was in dayltime, violence just seems glamorous to them, its as if we have learned nuthin!
You've obviously never been to Glasgow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6V-QEgYkuVE
It's the murder capital of western europe....no frog gene will change that
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBe it fighting with words or fist; I think it is in celtic DNA (some how roman breeding must have eliminated that from the french gene pool). The only thing history has shown to end inter celtic fighting seems to be an external common enemy. Irish folklore is filled with internal struggles starting with Cú Culainn.
i dunno, they fight where i live as well, infact i was driving home and there was a huge fight about thirty young people saw one young boy get koshed in the head with a bottle, this was in dayltime, violence just seems glamorous to them, its as if we have learned nuthin!