14 Dec 05
Originally posted by kyueChess engines have their own style of play, and make great decisions based on positions. Just because a person gets good at chess.. very good... doesn't mean they are going to play all their moves just like one of these engines over and over and over and over and over again.
But, how is it possible to decide that he was using software as opposed to a very good player?
P-
14 Dec 05
Originally posted by znshoOne key to detecting engine use is consistancy.
I still don't get it. How is it possible to decide if computer moves were made as opposed to a good player. Surely the good player and computer will both work out the same moves. Has Trackhead21 been unfairly removed?
Not even a GM is consistant, making better moves, moves based
on psycology, etc. An engine always makes what each one considers
the best move, and that move varies from engine to engine.
So if you use a certain program with a certain CPU and it matches
game after game the same moves made by a player here, it is
almost certain that player is using an engine.
14 Dec 05
Originally posted by znshoIf you don't get it, there is no point in trying to clear things up. I've stated enough.
I still don't get it. How is it possible to decide if computer moves were made as opposed to a good player. Surely the good player and computer will both work out the same moves. Has Trackhead21 been unfairly removed?
P-
14 Dec 05
Originally posted by sasquatch672Actually, Russ and I had a talk about that, I didn't want to make
What if you had, like, four different engines installed, and you used a different engine for every move? Do you think you'd maybe invent a new game?
On a serious note: when you use an engine, do you have to input the PGN:FEN for every move? I would guess so. What if you only used the engine beginning in the middle game for like five critical mo ...[text shortened]... on a driveway?
EDIT: Feeling slighlty mentally unstable today. Mind on 'idle' too long.
such a technique public, the enginites don't need any more tips.