Originally posted by Sicilian SmaugWell I could have time for both, also I didn't quite mean make a post just for recs but make a post thats funny(not gonna happen but i can imagine) and I would want to know what the target was to beat.
Yeah that may be true, here's a novel idea: Why not put the time that you would thinking up a record reccing post into trying to better your chess?
Originally posted by Will Everittths is almost certainly not the most ANY post has got ... but it is probly the most i have ever had: 20 recs for one post ...
Just would like to know if anyone can remember, then i may try and thing of something to beat it.
http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=8992
Originally posted by Hand of HecateThis is the best idea I've seen yet, you should stick it in the site ideas forum.
Recs should be accompanied by a Suck-O-Meter where posts can be rated on their level of Suckometry. Once maximum Suck points are achieved, the poster is executed.
Would you be able to give a rec and a succ for the same post?
1 edit
Originally posted by Will EverittYou said this in your last post.
i'm not going to go for an attempt to get them i just would like to know what the target is
However, I would like to quote your opening post...
Just would like to know if anyone can remember, then i may try and thing of something to beat it.
So, you're stupid AND full of sh!t.
Now I am caught up.
Originally posted by Checkmate187Sorry i havent been very clear I will admit this. What i meant all along was that i would like to have the most rec'ed post ever but i would not create a post for the sole purpose to get it rec'ed. I feel it would have to have another feature for example if there was something i know would get recs if i posted it but say i didnt belive it or it was not my thought then i wouldn't. I would not just say something off topic (this is where you find a quote to prove me wrong) if i got the most rec'ed post ever i would like it to be second to what that post said.
You said this in your last post.
However, I would like to quote your opening post...
Just would like to know if anyone can remember, [b]then i may try and thing of something to beat it.
So, you're stupid AND full of sh!t.
Now I am caught up.[/b]
Thank you for the criticism i hope this clears up what i meant.
Originally posted by Will EverittLogic's not your strong point, is it... 🙄
Sorry i havent been very clear I will admit this. What i meant all along was that i would like to have the most rec'ed post ever but i would not create a post for the sole purpose to get it rec'ed. I feel it would have to have another feature for example if there was something i know would get recs if i posted it but say i didnt belive it or it was no ...[text shortened]... second to what that post said.
Thank you for the criticism i hope this clears up what i meant.
Originally posted by Will EverittIt shows...
i don't have one
My advice would be to stalk someone who does have one. Then keep copying them until you can fake it yourself. After all, imitation is the highest form of flattery!
Oh and after the whole stalking thing, you could always go the extra mile ~ kill them and steal their identity.