Originally posted by HandyAndyFail and Fail Andrew,
Not not?
There is empirical evidence of Seitse terming him a 'non sub scum', because he did not renew his subscription.
'The foreseeable future', is an entirely relative term and may denote any duration of time and simply means a duration of time that is unspecified.
Bobs word has thus has been found to be true on both counts and you have been unable to proffer a single corroborating fact to the contrary.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSuch embarrassing obsequiousness has only four possible explanations:
I think you mean proof or was that a Freudian slip Anders?
Did or did not Bobs not renew his subscription?
Has he or has he not not created any threads during the undetermined time frame, 'foreseeable future'?
(a) You're sleeping with the Lard;
(b) You owe money to the Lard;
(c) You wish (a) or (b) above would be so;
(d) You have no dignity and/or a functioning brain.
Please be so kind to pick one. Inquiring minds need to know. For science.
Originally posted by Seitsea type of false dilemma my illustrious fiend! I could simply be the voice of justice and reason, a concerned citizen or spiderman in disguise, who has chanced upon a virtual mugging.
Such embarrassing obsequiousness has only four possible explanations:
(a) You're sleeping with the Lard;
(b) You owe money to the Lard;
(c) You wish (a) or (b) above would be so;
(d) You have no dignity and/or a functioning brain.
Please be so kind to pick one. Inquiring minds need to know. For science.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs usual, your logic is twisted.
Fail and Fail Andrew,
There is empirical evidence of Seitse terming him a 'non sub scum', because he did not renew his subscription.
'The foreseeable future', is an entirely relative term and may denote any duration of time and simply means a duration of time that is unspecified.
Bobs word has thus has been found to be true on both counts and you have been unable to proffer a single corroborating fact to the contrary.
