When is the fool leaving?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I think you mean proof or was that a Freudian slip Anders?

Did or did not Bobs not renew his subscription?

Has he or has he not not created any threads during the undetermined time frame, 'foreseeable future'?

Not not?

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Not not?

Fail and Fail Andrew,

There is empirical evidence of Seitse terming him a 'non sub scum', because he did not renew his subscription.

'The foreseeable future', is an entirely relative term and may denote any duration of time and simply means a duration of time that is unspecified.

Bobs word has thus has been found to be true on both counts and you have been unable to proffer a single corroborating fact to the contrary.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I think you mean proof or was that a Freudian slip Anders?

Did or did not Bobs not renew his subscription?

Has he or has he not not created any threads during the undetermined time frame, 'foreseeable future'?

Such embarrassing obsequiousness has only four possible explanations:

(a) You're sleeping with the Lard;
(b) You owe money to the Lard;
(c) You wish (a) or (b) above would be so;
(d) You have no dignity and/or a functioning brain.

Please be so kind to pick one. Inquiring minds need to know. For science.

Originally posted by Seitse
Such embarrassing obsequiousness has only four possible explanations:

(a) You're sleeping with the Lard;
(b) You owe money to the Lard;
(c) You wish (a) or (b) above would be so;
(d) You have no dignity and/or a functioning brain.

Please be so kind to pick one. Inquiring minds need to know. For science.

a type of false dilemma my illustrious fiend! I could simply be the voice of justice and reason, a concerned citizen or spiderman in disguise, who has chanced upon a virtual mugging.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Fail and Fail Andrew,

There is empirical evidence of Seitse terming him a 'non sub scum', because he did not renew his subscription.

'The foreseeable future', is an entirely relative term and may denote any duration of time and simply means a duration of time that is unspecified.

Bobs word has thus has been found to be true on both counts and you have been unable to proffer a single corroborating fact to the contrary.

When it comes to honesty, your interpretation of it is hardly the entry in encyclopaedia Britanica, is it.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Fail and Fail Andrew,

There is empirical evidence of Seitse terming him a 'non sub scum', because he did not renew his subscription.

'The foreseeable future', is an entirely relative term and may denote any duration of time and simply means a duration of time that is unspecified.

Bobs word has thus has been found to be true on both counts and you have been unable to proffer a single corroborating fact to the contrary.

As usual, your logic is twisted.

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Poof!

Andy, you're better than this.............

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Andy, you're better than this.............

Encourage him GB, he needs you.

Originally posted by HandyAndy
As usual, your logic is twisted.

What you actually meant to say Anders was, 'as usual your logic is unassailable'.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Andy, you're better than this.............

Gee I dunno Bobs, he is showing a rather worrying propensity for lewdness, i suspect its the company he keeps.

Originally posted by divegeester
Encourage him GB, he needs you.

We all need somebody.

Whom do you need?

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
We all need somebody.

Whom do you need?

It's your call; who do you need?

Originally posted by divegeester
It's your call; who do you need?

I need my blankey.😳

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Andy, you're better than this.............

Better than what, Bobby? Jousting with a fool?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
the voice of justice and reason

In which hole he puts his wrinkled and Metamucil-reeking hand to
move your mouthpiece?