Go back
Where is he?

Where is he?

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
No principled initiative born of conviction? Moral imperative? Ethical initiative? Expression of contrary opinion, such as you've reserved for yourself?
Mr Kant, with this epistemology you are really spoiling us!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
That's a different story. You may feel a moral or ethical compulsion to take action. Worthy, however misguided as I or others may feel it is, of respect. Still, its not your job.

In this case, it is my opinion, again based upon quantitative and qualitiative empirical evidence, that you are being played by casualdust. You can continue this chara ...[text shortened]... om, justice, the American Way.

(A little over the top at the end, but, I couldn't resist.)
http://uk.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate


In this case, it is my opinion, again based upon quantitative and qualitiative empirical evidence, that you are being played by casualdust.
Yep, even multiple personalities can charm old dudes.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
That's a different story. You may feel a moral or ethical compulsion to take action. Worthy, however misguided as I or others may feel it is, of respect. Still, its not your job.

In this case, it is my opinion, again based upon quantitative and qualitiative empirical evidence, that you are being played by casualdust. You can continue this chara om, justice, the American Way.

(A little over the top at the end, but, I couldn't resist.)
Let's cut to the chase, Hand, as we've done elsewhere. Only thing that matters to you or me is what's real, what's accurate, what's true.

Let's not dimiss the record. same posts, same replies. No different story. Nothing particularly worthy or misguided on either your part or

mine. What others may think is totally inconsequential. You're talking face to face with me. The linkage of your logic in no way supports

"Still, it's not your job". "Empirical evidence" seems little more than a comfortable knee jerk frame of reference from your day job. Here

rational thought and standards of social conduct are in play, not sterile test tubes. A new member (male or female) deserves some space.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Daemon Sin
Mr Kant, with this epistemology you are really spoiling us!
Guessing that you were the first in line to sell your #101 humanities textbook the afternoon of the same day your class was over.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Let's cut to the chase, Hand, as we've done elsewhere. Only thing that matters to you or me is what's real, what's accurate, what's true.

Let's not dimiss the record. same posts, same replies. No different story. Nothing particularly worthy or misguided on either your part or

mine. What others may think is totally inconsequential. You're talkin ...[text shortened]... in play, not sterile test tubes. A new member (male or female) deserves some space.
Some new members are old members. And some old members are ancient.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sunburnt
Yep, even multiple personalities can charm old dudes.
Please go to my profile. The photo is two years old. Guy in that photo is hardly old mentally, emotionally or physically. His tastes are discriminating.



😀

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sunburnt
Some new members are old members. And some old members are ancient.
Sweetheart, you're way out of your league. Why make a fool of yourself in public.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Please go to my profile. The photo is two years old. Guy in that photo is hardly old mentally, emotionally or physically. His tastes are discriminating.



😀
Yeah, William Shatner has aged quite well!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Guessing that you were the first in line to sell your #101 humanities textbook the afternoon of the same day your class was over.
Well you did offer me quite a good price for it. 😉

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Sweetheart, you're way out of your league. Why make a fool of yourself in public.
I don't know what you think you are talking about. I'm alluding to multiple user accounts in my post, GB. That's a lame insult coming from you. Btw, the general forum is not exactly "public".

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Daemon Sin
Yeah, William Shatner has aged quite well!
Hmm... Irontigran said something similar. Never been on a space ship though.


😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sunburnt
I don't know what you think you are talking about. I'm alluding to multiple user accounts in my post, GB. That's a lame insult coming from you. Btw, the general forum is not exactly "public".
Suggesting the RHP General Forum is private? By the way, I would so much rather enyoy your interesting points of view than fuss with you.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Suggesting the RHP General Forum is private? By the way, I would so much rather enyoy your interesting points of view than fuss with you.
Then why dismiss her first post in such a condescending manner?


Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Let's cut to the chase, Hand, as we've done elsewhere. Only thing that matters to you or me is what's real, what's accurate, what's true.

Let's not dimiss the record. same posts, same replies. No different story. Nothing particularly worthy or misguided on either your part or

mine. What others may think is totally inconsequential. You're talkin ...[text shortened]... in play, not sterile test tubes. A new member (male or female) deserves some space.
You profess to value the truth. Well the truth is that casualdust is an idiot and undeserving of your 'protection'. You can side with this fool if that amuses you, but, please don't pretend that you're on some altruistic quest.

If you are indeed blind to this insipid dolt's manipulations, I'd ask that you please review some of casualdust's posts again. While I won't pretend to know 'her' motives, please note the transparent, fumbling attempts to beguile and deceive. Note the inaccuracies. Note the obvious site knowledge. Note the allusions to multiple accounts. Not the multiple signature spellings. Note the sheer, over the top idiocy. If you still remain unconvinced then, by all means, continue.

On another note, I disagree with your assessment that newcomers deserve a little space. Perhaps in the real world yes, give them space, make them comfortable, wlecome them with open arms. Here, on the internet, why would you ever do such a thing? 'Relationships' are transitory at best, fleeting, and fast. Present yourself to be an idiot and expect swift retribution or, at least, expect to be ignored. Blunder in as a contaminant to the test tube and expect to be expunged. On the otherhand, come in as a sane and reasonable person and you'll likely be welcomed appropriately.