Go back
which is worth more money?

which is worth more money?

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Subscriber fee, or the cash that advertisers pay to display ads to non-subscribers?

If Russ gets more money per player if they are non-subs, maybe we should not be subs.....hmmm?

1 edit

im pretty positive russ makes more per subscriber. why make incentive for non subcribers if not. Now get a membership you cheap bastard!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by uzless
Subscriber fee, or the cash that advertisers pay to display ads to non-subscribers?

If Russ gets more money per player if they are non-subs, maybe we should not be subs.....hmmm?
Totally agree..

Play as many concurrent games as your heart desires.. (fixed yearly fee)
Compete in tournaments.. (the same fixed yearly fee)
Join or have your own Clan (the very same fixed yearly fee)

...and the list goes on.. cough up.

No adverts? Priceless.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by pawnfondler
im pretty positive russ makes more per subscriber. why make incentive for non subcribers if not. Now get a membership you cheap bastard!
"If you like playing chess at 'Time For Chess', please consider unsubscribing. The 'Time For Chess' community depends on non-subs for its continued existence and improvement, and for the nominal non-subscription non-fee (0 cents a week), a lot of the site's features will not be available to you anymore, thus enabling you to lead a normal life."

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
"If you like playing chess at 'Time For Chess', please consider unsubscribing. The 'Time For Chess' community depends on non-subs for its continued existence and improvement, and for the nominal non-subscription non-fee (0 cents a week), a lot of the site's features will not be available to you anymore, thus enabling you to lead a normal life."
Hear hear.

Come on all you subscribers - become a scumbag freeloader and help support the site.
You know it makes sense. 😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by pawnfondler
im pretty positive russ makes more per subscriber. why make incentive for non subcribers if not. Now get a membership you cheap bastard!
Hey, it's a possibility that he makes more money from non-subscribers...perhaps not. Either way, it was just a question.

Vote Up
Vote Down

i've never really understood the way many subscribers seem to resent the deal that non-subscribers get and want them to subscribe. i subscribe because i like playing more than six games at once and because i think it's a great site which i'm happy to support, but i couldn't care less whether other people choose to subscribe or not.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

What's Frank been up to this time?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by uzless
Hey, it's a possibility that he makes more money from non-subscribers...perhaps not. Either way, it was just a question.
You'd suspect not, otherwise he'd surely offer all the features to non-subs. Also with the availability of adblockers these days, there is probably a large number of non-subs who are effectively bringing in nothing.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by uzless
Subscriber fee, or the cash that advertisers pay to display ads to non-subscribers?

If Russ gets more money per player if they are non-subs, maybe we should not be subs.....hmmm?
it's worth it not to look at those ads.