@suzianne said...but I am as easily distracted as the next man.
I don't think Russ would appreciate being bothered with such a triviality.
The man's got a lot on his plate.
First mention of the "Take it to.." spanky line was by @Daemon-Sin at 2006-12-11 18:40:15.
Then again by @Orange-Peel 1 minute 30 seconds later....and then so on!
1 edit
The big caveat is that content has been deleted, but I don't believe that is the case here. Anyway, history right here -> Thread 57958
edit : Also, "spanky" used numerous time before then, but not in this context.
@russ saidThat was my first thought as well but seems more like a British term.
My money was on @Phlabibit.
1 edit
@russ saidSuzie Q arrived in 2003 and the post you show isn't until 2004. She said it had been in use before she got here. Not saying it isn't possible that he may have started it.
...but I am as easily distracted as the next man.
First mention of the "Take it to.." spanky line was by @Daemon-Sin at 2006-12-11 18:40:15.
Then again by @Orange-Peel 1 minute 30 seconds later....and then so on!
Phlabs would also have been my bet, but I don't know if he was around at that time before 2003?
-VR
@russ saidI never woulda guessed Daemon Sin.
...but I am as easily distracted as the next man.
First mention of the "Take it to.." spanky line was by @Daemon-Sin at 2006-12-11 18:40:15.
Then again by @Orange-Peel 1 minute 30 seconds later....and then so on!
Phlabibit, yeah, or even XanthosNZ or Moldy Crow.
@very-rusty saidHe got here 6 months or so ahead of me.
Suzie Q arrived in 2003 and the post you show isn't until 2004. She said it had been in use before she got here. Not saying it isn't possible that he may have started it.
Phlabs would also have been my bet, but I don't know if he was around at that time before 2003?
-VR
I do have a memory of it suddenly being used a lot, and 2004 was right after 2003, so my memory may not be what it used to be.