Go back
Women's Group Applauds British MPs' Abortion-Can

Women's Group Applauds British MPs' Abortion-Can

General

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
09 Feb 04
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Women's Group Applauds British MPs' Abortion-Cancer Probe / Criticizes Dr. Stuart Donnan's Hyposcrisy
Karen Malec

Reproduced with Permission
Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer welcomes the efforts of British MP Claire Curtis-Thomas and her colleagues who asked doctors to examine women's reproductive histories and the abortion-breast cancer (ABC) link within their patient populations. The coalition condemns the efforts of Manchester University Professor Stuart Donnan to disabuse women of the truth that abortion raises breast cancer risk. Donnan misled the BBC by saying some studies reported risk elevations, but others show abortion reduces risk. [1]

If you want to read more about this issue:

http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/mal/mal_02donnanhyposcrisy.html

r

Joined
24 Mar 02
Moves
3901
Clock
10 Feb 04
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Women's Group Applauds British MPs' Abortion-Cancer Probe / Criticizes Dr. Stuart Donnan's Hyposcrisy
Karen Malec

Reproduced with Permission
Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer welcomes ...[text shortened]... p://www.lifeissues.net/writers/mal/mal_02donnanhyposcrisy.html

There's no convincing evidence at all that abortion raises breast cancer risk. The early studies on abortion and breast cancer compared women who had had abortions with the population generally, failing to take into account that those with abortions were likely to have had fewer children. We already know that having fewer children is a risk factor for breast cancer, so these studies falsely identified an abortion link. There is also good evidence that women undergoing treatment for breast cancer are more likely to be open about earlier medical treatment, including abortion, reinforcing the false impression of a relationship between the two.

The fact is that we already know all the major factors that contribute to breast cancer risk. These are: delayed motherhood, small number of children, early first period, lack of breastfeeding, obesity and high alcohol consumption. Abortion is enough of a traumatic experience, without women wrongly being fed scare stories about how it will affect their health.

Rich.


i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
10 Feb 04
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by richhoey
There's no convincing evidence at all that abortion raises breast cancer risk. The early studies on abortion and breast cancer compared women who had had abortions with the population generally, failing to take into account that those wit ...[text shortened]... care stories about how it will affect their health.

Rich.


Where did you get that information ?

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
10 Feb 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Women's Group Applauds British MPs' Abortion-Cancer Probe / Criticizes Dr. Stuart Donnan's Hyposcrisy
Karen Malec

Reproduced with Permission
Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer welcomes the efforts of British MP Claire Curtis-Thomas and her colleagues who asked doctors to examine women's reproductive hi ...[text shortened]... more about this issue:

http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/mal/mal_02donnanhyposcrisy.html

A very disingenius post indeed:
- The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer isn't a 'women's group', by any commonly understood meaning of the term;
- we have a UK MP with one opinion, and a professor with another. Yet we're condemning the professor for expressing a view. Do we really not want aademics expressing opinions on these (or any other) matters?;
- What qualification does the MP have?;
- How many of her 'colleagues' (presumably fellow MPs) support her view?.

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
10 Feb 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Redmike
[b]A very disingenius post indeed:

It would help if you'd make a distinction between the article the post is presenting and the post itself.



i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
10 Feb 04
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by richhoey
There's no convincing evidence at all that abortion raises breast cancer risk. The early studies on abortion and breast cancer compared women who had had abortions with the population generally, failing to take into account that those wit ...[text shortened]... care stories about how it will affect their health.

Rich.


I'm glad you admit that performing abortion can be a traumatic experience for a woman. A Dutch (female) abortion doctor stated not so long ago that performing abortion was something like cutting your nails.

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
10 Feb 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe

It would help if you'd make a distinction between the article the post is presenting and the post itself.



My criticisms are all of the post. I've asked questions of what was posted. Seems clear enough to me.

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
10 Feb 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Women's Group Applauds British MPs' Abortion-Cancer Probe / Criticizes Dr. Stuart Donnan's Hyposcrisy
Karen Malec

Reproduced with Permission
Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer welcomes the efforts of British MP Claire Curtis-Thomas and her colleagues who asked doctors to examine women's reproductive hi ...[text shortened]... more about this issue:

http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/mal/mal_02donnanhyposcrisy.html

The relavant BBC article is at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3419329.stm.

It seems that 3 (yes, just 3) MPs have written to the doctors in their areas with some kind of questionaire about the supposed link between abortion and breast cancer.

The MP's biography says she's an engineer, so she's no qualification.

Not really that much of a story, when you look at it a bit closer.

p

Graceland.

Joined
02 Dec 02
Moves
18130
Clock
10 Feb 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

I highly doubdt it matters in any case Ivanhoe. If women want an abortion, the risk of possible future cancer will not deter them. If you haven't got a problem with killing a lifeform you created in the first place, the slight possibility that you increase your risk of cancer is very unlikely to make you change your mind. Especially not if its nothing more substantial than the risk through smoking forinstance.

cheers

r

Joined
24 Mar 02
Moves
3901
Clock
10 Feb 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Where did you get that information ?

I work for a very large cancer research organisation, and part of my job is coordinating our response to this kind of thing. Basically, I spoke to a number of relevant experts and read through a selection of papers.

Rich.

i

Felicific Forest

Joined
15 Dec 02
Moves
49429
Clock
10 Feb 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by richhoey
I work for a very large cancer research organisation, and part of my job is coordinating our response to this kind of thing. Basically, I spoke to a number of relevant experts and read through a selection of papers.

Rich.

Can you give internet sites that provide such information ?

r

Joined
24 Mar 02
Moves
3901
Clock
10 Feb 04
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
I'm glad you admit that performing abortion can be a traumatic experience for a woman. A Dutch (female) abortion doctor stated not so long ago that performing abortion was something like cutting your nails.
Um, not really a case of glad to admit. I've never given my opinion of abortion on this site, but from the experience of my friends I'd say it can be very traumatic. But being traumatic doesn't mean it increases the risk of breast cancer.

Rich.

r

Joined
24 Mar 02
Moves
3901
Clock
10 Feb 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe

Can you give internet sites that provide such information ?
If you visit here and search for abortion and breast cancer, you'll trawl up some of the published information.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/

Like I say, partly I arrived at my conclusion from chatting to scientists who work for my organisation, some of whom are currently involved in a large-scale review of the evidence.

Rich.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.