yes or no.

Originally posted by misslead

A wholehearted no, why attack someone whom you suspect of having terrible biological weapons if you don't want them to use them? Seems like a surefire way to provoke them into using them if you ask me

Joe

Certainly not.

it's a simple principle - never be the one to start a war. Then there aren't any (a little romantic I know)

Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the naive hue of resolution
Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pitch and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action.

Shakespeare, Hamlet

Hermann Goering

"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ..Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger."

Source: Nuremberg Trials

Originally posted by Quick
it's a simple principle - never be the one to start a war. Then there aren't any (a little romantic I know)

Originally posted by kyngj
A wholehearted no, why attack someone whom you suspect of having terrible biological weapons if you don't want them to use them? Seems like a surefire way to provoke them into using them if you ask me

Joe

Originally posted by misslead
Description: You'll lose a lot of sleep. Ralph does. At first he finds it hard to drop off. Then he starts waking up earlier. And earlier. But that isn't when he starts seeing things. Colors, shapes, strange auras around his friends. Not to mention the bald doctors who always turn up at the scene of a death. The evil looking one clutching a rusty scalpel. All that comes later..

Originally posted by fexkorn
are you a stephen king fan?