@ghost-of-a-duke saidI have replied to it twice. I'm keeping up reasonably well.
It's rather telling that you're responding to all my posts, except this one.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNope. No irony. You keep repeating that I am "toxic" in my interactions with Indonesia Phil but won't give even one example. It is curious.
Oh, the irony.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIt surely is my concern as you have claimed it was caused by my "existence".
Sorry, did you miss the part where I said it was none of your concern?
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Seeing as you have come up with nothing and nor has Indonesia Phil, perhsps we can just agree that there is no toxicity between me and him.
@fmf saidHang on, I need to find an appropriate fable.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Seeing as you have come up with nothing and nor has Indonesia Phil, perhsps we can just agree that there is no toxicity between me and him.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidPossibly this could take awhile, time for a snack or coffee. 🙂 😛
Hang on, I need to find an appropriate fable.
-VR
@very-rusty saidI'm procrastinating. Need to complete a benefit form. (Not for myself).
Possibly this could take awhile, time for a snack or coffee. 🙂 😛
-VR
Anyway, lunch break over.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhy entertain this dufus by answering his condescension?
Yes, I have. I explained you are toxic in most of your interactions, including Phil. It's fine if you don't agree with this assessment.
He's clearly not in your league.
Unless, of course, you're feeling sorry for the miserable hack: In which case, the entertainment is ours to share. 😁
@very-rusty saidThank you Very Rusty!
woofwoof...You are not required to answer this question without a lawyer present. 🙂
-VR
I appreciate your concern.
I'll take that under advisement by counsel. 🙂