Go back
You guys

You guys

General


@ghost-of-a-duke said
It's rather telling that you're responding to all my posts, except this one.
I have replied to it twice. I'm keeping up reasonably well.


@fmf said
If he's done nothing "unpleasant" why is the relationship between you not what it was?
Sorry, did you miss the part where I said it was none of your concern?


@ghost-of-a-duke said
Oh, the irony.
Nope. No irony. You keep repeating that I am "toxic" in my interactions with Indonesia Phil but won't give even one example. It is curious.


@ghost-of-a-duke said
Sorry, did you miss the part where I said it was none of your concern?
It surely is my concern as you have claimed it was caused by my "existence".


@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Seeing as you have come up with nothing and nor has Indonesia Phil, perhsps we can just agree that there is no toxicity between me and him.


@fmf said
@Ghost-of-a-Duke
Seeing as you have come up with nothing and nor has Indonesia Phil, perhsps we can just agree that there is no toxicity between me and him.
Hang on, I need to find an appropriate fable.


@fmf said
Phil has been the topic since page 3. Hence your copy pasting of fables in an attempt to justify the strange things you've said about him
It appears you are much more interested than Phil is himself! 😛 🙂

-VR


@ghost-of-a-duke said
Hang on, I need to find an appropriate fable.
Possibly this could take awhile, time for a snack or coffee. 🙂 😛

-VR


@very-rusty said
Possibly this could take awhile, time for a snack or coffee. 🙂 😛

-VR
I'm procrastinating. Need to complete a benefit form. (Not for myself).

Anyway, lunch break over.


@woofwoof said
Just admit it:Your "stinky bag of onions" is just a stupid con job masquerading as a podcast.
Did Ghost of a Duke tell you this?


@fmf said
Did Ghost of a Duke tell you this?
woofwoof...You are not required to answer this question without a lawyer present. 🙂

-VR


@ghost-of-a-duke said
Yes, I have. I explained you are toxic in most of your interactions, including Phil. It's fine if you don't agree with this assessment.
Why entertain this dufus by answering his condescension?

He's clearly not in your league.

Unless, of course, you're feeling sorry for the miserable hack: In which case, the entertainment is ours to share. 😁


@very-rusty said
woofwoof...You are not required to answer this question without a lawyer present. 🙂

-VR
Thank you Very Rusty!
I appreciate your concern.

I'll take that under advisement by counsel. 🙂


@woofwoof said
Thank you Very Rusty!
I appreciate your concern.

I'll take that under advisement by counsel. 🙂
Your welcome!

Your Lawyer may not want you to answer any questions. 🙂

-VR