Originally posted by FlyingWolfI haven't had one for some time, but I thought a stalemate was automatically recognized on this site and the game automatically ended by the RHP server software.
I've been in this situation myself a few times and wondered why the game doesn't automatically default to a draw. Seems odd that a player has to [b]claim the draw when it's a clear stalemate position.
FW[/b]
Otherwise the player who cannot make a legal move would end up timing out and losing instead of having the game end as a draw.
Am I missing something?
Originally posted by mwmillerStalemate is recognised, but lone K versus lone K is not stalemate because both sides have legal moves.
I haven't had one for some time, but I thought a stalemate was automatically recognized on this site and the game automatically ended by the RHP server software.
Otherwise the player who cannot make a legal move would end up timing out and losing instead of having the game end as a draw.
Am I missing something?
From the FAQ: Insufficient material remains on the board to finish the game. If only two kings remain then either player may claim a draw during their next move. If you Google it, two remaining Kings represents a 'tied' game, but is not stalemate. I guess the game could continue infinitum, but then would fall foul of the No piece capture or pawn movement has occurred for over 50 consecutive moves (100 half moves). Therefore the game has not progressed and a draw may be claimed by either player during their next move rule. Either way, a draw has to be claimed it seems. There, I've learnt something today......!