Collaborative games?

Russ,

How about a feature like the Kasparov v The World match? 2-X players against 1-Y players with discussion capabilities and move voting for both sides?

Cheers,

Paul.

That sounds fun!😵

I could do it - but it will be way off in the future before I got round to it. I should imagine it would be lots of fun, though.

-Russ

Originally posted by Russ
I could do it - but it will be way off in the future before I got round to it. I should imagine it would be lots of fun, though.

-Russ

We can do it already can't we?:
a) David Tebb sets up an "I am DT" clan
b) Team captain sets up a "challenge DT" clan
c) Everyone who wants to beat DT registers with the "Challenge DT" clan
d) The captain sets up a clan match with DT, both clans set themselves to accept no more challenges
e) The challenge is played out - the challengers can use the "message clan members" feature for their discussion.

To be fair, the captain should be someone with a high rating so DT doesn't lose too many rating points 😉

I think this should work... Anyone see any flaws?

That sounds good....I'd like to see how rating plebeians such as myself would fare against a heavy hitter, en masse.

Originally posted by iamatiger
I think this should work... Anyone see any flaws?[/b]

Originally posted by David Tebb
Yes, I'm not doing it! 😉

Originally posted by TimmyToilet
Now thats a flaw isn't it?

Originally posted by iamatiger
We can do it already can't we?:
a) David Tebb sets up an "I am DT" clan
b) Team captain sets up a "challenge DT" clan
c) Everyone who wants to beat DT registers with the "Challenge DT" clan
d) The captain sets up a clan match with DT, both clans set themselves to accept no more challenges
e) The challenge is played out - the challengers can use ...[text shortened]... DT doesn't lose too many rating points 😉

I think this should work... Anyone see any flaws?