7 edits
Originally posted by 24sum fule mafamdishens mite dissergwee wiv yer.
Please feel free clarify whether the degree of inconceivability you allude to is near, or if it is absolute. It cannot be both, as any fule kno.
Pitiful.
consider n an integer, and m a real number ... where m=1/n.
if n=1 then m=1,
now imagine n=2, in which case m = 0.5
next imagine n=3 or n=4 etc
so m= 0.33333 or m=0.25 etc
as n gets bigger and bigger the number m becomes smaller and smaller.
if we talk of what happens to m as n gets bigger and bigger, we talk of m getting to be nearly absolutely inconceivably miniscule.
it never gets absolutely inconceivably miniscule (zero)
it does get smaller than you can ever conceive of.
yet there is always a more miniscule number.
skeeter correctly gives the smallest possible description without completely ruling out all existence of hope ...
(skeeter: i humbly beg your forgiveness for backing you up, simply an accident, i will try not to let it happen again in the future 😉)
Originally posted by flexmoreYea, you just watch it Flex. This jumping in on my side of the debate is not on. Ppl will start to think we actually like each other and that won't do. 😉
sum fule mafamdishens mite dissergwee wiv yer.
skeeter correctly gives the smallest possible description without completely ruling out all existence of hope ...
(skeeter: i humbly beg your forgiveness for backing you up, simply an accident, i will try not to let it happen again in the future 😉)
skeeter