20 Jul '06 10:26>
"One good move doesn't save a bad game.
One bad move can ruin a good game."
- Fabian Fnas
Usually one says that the rating reflects how good you are in playing chess. But I'm not so sure about that anymore.
When do I win?
Very often when my opponent have blundered. Not so often when I have played well.
When do I lose?
Very often when I myself have blundered in certain moves.
I can have a pretty good position and *wham*, there I go, not remembering that my Knight was en prise or something. Losing a game that I was sure of winning eventually.
I have a rating around 1550. But is that how good I am?
No, it doesn't. It just show how often I discover others blunders and how seldom I do mine own.
If I just get rid of my blunders, I'm sure that I can rise myself another 100 points in relative short period of time, right?
And if I only discover my opponents blunders before I make my own move, I can rise my rating even more.
So by this method I can rise my rating not even to be a more skilled player but just learn to identify the blunders of my own and opponents. I don't even have to play better chess, not a bit...
Forget about open diagonals, bad and good bishops, sound territorial maneuvering and such silly things. The most important is to discover blunders.
Any comments, anyone?
One bad move can ruin a good game."
- Fabian Fnas
Usually one says that the rating reflects how good you are in playing chess. But I'm not so sure about that anymore.
When do I win?
Very often when my opponent have blundered. Not so often when I have played well.
When do I lose?
Very often when I myself have blundered in certain moves.
I can have a pretty good position and *wham*, there I go, not remembering that my Knight was en prise or something. Losing a game that I was sure of winning eventually.
I have a rating around 1550. But is that how good I am?
No, it doesn't. It just show how often I discover others blunders and how seldom I do mine own.
If I just get rid of my blunders, I'm sure that I can rise myself another 100 points in relative short period of time, right?
And if I only discover my opponents blunders before I make my own move, I can rise my rating even more.
So by this method I can rise my rating not even to be a more skilled player but just learn to identify the blunders of my own and opponents. I don't even have to play better chess, not a bit...
Forget about open diagonals, bad and good bishops, sound territorial maneuvering and such silly things. The most important is to discover blunders.
Any comments, anyone?