Dutch Defence (1.d4 f5)

Hey, guys! I was wondering what is your opinion on the Dutch Defence (1.d4 f5), regardless of whether you play this opening or not.

Dutch is one of the sharpest replies to d4 if you play the Leningrad Dutch, a KID setup with the pawn already on f5.
Or you can choose a more positional approach by playing the solid Stonewall Dutch.
And there's also the Classical Dutch, which is somewhere between a Leningrad and a Stonewall in terms of aggressiveness.

Overall it's a sound yet somewhat risky opening. A good choice if you need a win with black against 1. d4. Probably the biggest drawback (at least for me) is that white has some annoying anti-Dutch systems like 1. d4 f5 2. Bg5. So you might not get to play the main lines. Especially the Leningrad Dutch is heavy on theory.

Originally posted by Kalhornov
Dutch is one of the sharpest replies to d4 if you play the Leningrad Dutch, a KID setup with the pawn already on f5.
Or you can choose a more positional approach by playing the solid Stonewall Dutch.
And there's also the Classical Dutch, which is somewhere between a Leningrad and a Stonewall in terms of aggressiveness.

Overall it's a sound yet somewha ...[text shortened]... o you might not get to play the main lines. Especially the Leningrad Dutch is heavy on theory.

Alekhine, Nimzovich, and Botvinnik were adherents of the Dutch. Two world champions and a close runner-up. The Dutch is in good company.

I am a French player who also likes the Dutch. I mainly play the classical and I get around the anti dutch systems by playing 1.d4 e6
That way I can transpose into a French.

Originally posted by Chufty Jones
I am a French player who also likes the Dutch. I mainly play the classical and I get around the anti dutch systems by playing 1.d4 e6
That way I can transpose into a French.

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
Alekhine, Nimzovich, and Botvinnik were adherents of the Dutch. Two world champions and a close runner-up. The Dutch is in good company.

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
Not to mention Morphy, Steinitz & Chigorin if we're going way back.

Classical Dutch is a setup with pawns on f5, e6, d6, and Nf6, Be7.
Similar to a Stonewall but without the gaping hole on e5.

I always go for the Leningrad type setup.
It's the sharpest line but almost guaranteed an interesting game.
Here's the typical starting structure for black:

White to play

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
Yeah the 2.Bg5 Dutch is a pain & it's quite common.
The response I've found best is to simply chase the B away.
So:
1.d4...f5
2.Bg5...h6
3.Bh4...g5
4.Bg3

Then you're looking to develop normally with Bg7, 0-0 & should be fine.

Originally posted by Fat Lady
I don't like this line for Black at all, and it's worth pointing out that Black is probably lost after 1.d4 f5 2.Bg5 h6 3.Bh4 g5 4.Bg3 f4? 5.e3! e.g. 5. ... h5 6.Be2! Nf6 7.exf4

I think White can do better than that:

1.d4 f5 2.Bg5 h6 3.Bh4 g5 4.Bg3 Bg7 5.e4 and if 5. ... f4 then 6.Bxf4 gxf4 7.Qh5+ Kf8 8.Qf5+ Ke8 9.Be2 and I think White gets the piece back with a much superior position.

In my opinion Black's position after move 4 is overextended and a simple plan for White is to castle queenside and open up the kingside.

Yeah but I'm not suggesting ...f4 😛
fxe4 looks reasonable in your line.

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
Yeah the 2.Bg5 Dutch is a pain & it's quite common.
The response I've found best is to simply chase the B away.
So:
1.d4...f5
2.Bg5...h6
3.Bh4...g5
4.Bg3

Then you're looking to develop normally with Bg7, 0-0 & should be fine.