Originally posted by Sicilian SmaugFrom reading and exp, it seems that knights are strongest on the 6th rank and actually weaken as they progress to the 7th and 8th, where they can influence less squares.
[bA knight on the 6th, 7th or 8th rank is usually very strong, and sometimes deadly. That is as long as they are not placed in a corner where nothing is happening.[/b]
Originally posted by ShinidokiI also read that
A strong Knight outpost is often worth a Rook.
a bad Bishop [trapped] is of little more value than that of a pawn. And a Rook without any open, or semi-open files is pretty damn useless.
The value of the peieces very much depends on the position, that is obvoius....sometimes, a Queen easily prevails over Two Rooks, and at other times, it is helpless. therefore to simply stick to numerical guidlines (pawn=1, bishop =3, etc) is simply absurd.
a Rook = 5 pawns
a Queen = 10 pawns = 2 Rooks
But these values are absolute values , for instance if there was only a Queen and 2 rooks on the board
A knight Vs a Bishop... who wins? obviously there is no victor in an ideal world. But, on a blank board the bishop can "corral" the knight if it were to make a wrong move (say the knight is on g6 and the bishop is on d7, the knight moves to h8 and the bishop then moves to e8) and then be captured on the next move. I don't see any way the knight can do the same to the bishop. In this respect, the bishop is superrior as the bishop can always escape the knight on an open board.
Yet on a closed board with many pawns and pieces the knight can dance circles around the bishop, creating many threats with each move and easily capturing the bishop, this is the secret of the knights power.
With everything taken together, with every possible scenario that arises, they are equal pieces. It is the decisions you make in the single chess game as to how many pawns and other pieces get traded away that will make one more valuable then the other.
Originally posted by HFRorbisReally? Even against isolated pawns they will have trouble as whilst attacking one another will march down the board supported by the king.
A knight or a Bishop could take on 3 isolated pawns
The 3 pawns could win. The B or N could not even if it wins all 3 pawns.
I would far rather have the 3 pawns.
Originally posted by HFRorbis2 Rooks will generally be better than a Queen on a semi open board where their manouverability is not effected (especially if they have support from a few minor pieces) whilst a Queen will be far better if the ranks and files are closed as she will be able to get amoung the pawns and pick them off.
I also read that
a Rook = 5 pawns
a Queen = 10 pawns = 2 Rooks
But these values are absolute values , for instance if there was only a Queen and 2 rooks on the board
In the former case a Q might be worth a couple of pawns less than the Rs whilst in the latter a couple of pawns more. No matter what the board I am always very wary about giving up this exchange either way as unless one side can see an immediate plan that wins more material it is difficult to assess which is better.