Hey Guys! It's me again. 😀
Anyway I'm just wonderig what do you guys think of this new way I came up with. I don't know if it's good or not because I haven't tryied it yet. 😀 But here it is anyway:
(white would be me.)
1.e4..e5 2.Nf3..Nc6 3.Bc4..Nf6 4.Ng5..Nxe4 5.Nxf7..(if Ke8xNf7 it's over.) But if you are smart... Qe7 6.Nxh8..Nd4 7.Bf7+..Kxf7 8.Nxf7 or...
7.Bf7+..Qxf7 8.Nxf7..Kxf7 (I then would have his Queen for a Knight)
You guys might not like it; but I'm looking for a "good" response.
I hope you'll understand it! 😉
PS: If you guys don't think it's good, then send me a beter one. 😉
Originally posted by AJMagicman1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 is called Two-Knights defence. Very sharp opening. 4.Ng5 is natural move, black normal response is 4...d5 5.exd5 Na5 with good play for the pawn. 4...Nxe4 looks too risky for me - 5.Nxf7 Qh4 6.0-0 - white should be able to repel the attack and keep extra material.
Hey Guys! It's me again. 😀
Anyway I'm just wonderig what do you guys think of this new way I came up with. I don't know if it's good or not because I haven't tryied it yet. 😀 But here it is anyway:
(white would be me.)
1.e4..e5 2.Nf3..Nc6 3.Bc4..Nf6 4.Ng5..Nxe4 5.Nxf7..(if Ke8xNf7 it's over.) But if you are smart... Qe7 6.Nxh8..Nd4 7.Bf7+..Kx ...[text shortened]... you'll understand it! 😉
PS: If you guys don't think it's good, then send me a beter one. 😉
Originally posted by TovMauzerThanks TovMauzer! 😉
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 is called Two-Knights defence. Very sharp opening. 4.Ng5 is natural move, black normal response is 4...d5 5.exd5 Na5 with good play for the pawn. 4...Nxe4 looks too risky for me - 5.Nxf7 Qh4 6.0-0 - white should be able to repel the attack and keep extra material.
I really apreciate your help!
So do you like the moves that I came up with?
😀
Originally posted by AJMagicmanYou still seem confused on the rules of the game. Ke8xf7 is impossible. I don't mean, if Black makes that move the game is over. I mean, Black actually can't make the move because it is illegal. You can never make a move that puts your king into check. And if your opponent mistakenly makes a move that puts his own king in check, you can't just collect his king and announce "checkmate"; you have to point out that the move is illegal, and he must make another one.
1.e4..e5 2.Nf3..Nc6 3.Bc4..Nf6 4.Ng5..Nxe4 5.Nxf7..(if Ke8xNf7 it's over.)
Originally posted by AJMagicmanHi magician
Hey Guys! It's me again. 😀
Anyway I'm just wonderig what do you guys think of this new way I came up with. I don't know if it's good or not because I haven't tryied it yet. 😀 But here it is anyway:
(white would be me.)
1.e4..e5 2.Nf3..Nc6 3.Bc4..Nf6 4.Ng5..Nxe4 5.Nxf7..(if Ke8xNf7 it's over.) But if you are smart... Qe7 6.Nxh8..Nd4 7.Bf7+..Kx ...[text shortened]... you'll understand it! 😉
PS: If you guys don't think it's good, then send me a beter one. 😉
I admire your enthusiasm, but in chess you must always assume the other guy knows what he's doing. Otherwise you can look forward to being continually surprised (and beaten) by their counter-play.
In your example you start off with a standard opening untill 4...Nxe4?? you should assume that black will never make this move (unless he has his eyes closed and is using the Force!) because aside from 5.Nxf7 it also would allow 5.Nxe4 ...Black is a knight down for a mere pawn.
Black's response to 4.Ng5 would likely be 4...Pd5 attacking your bishop and blocking its support for the f7 attack ...or possibly 4...Bc5 to allow for some interesting counter-play by attacking your f2.
Also take note of Natural Science's post above - He is absolutely correct.
With practice you can become a good player - but ALWAYS assume your opponent is also a good player. 🙂
Regards,
SB
Originally posted by ShallowBlue5.Nxe4 allows d5, and I'm not sure if white is better at all...
In your example you start off with a standard opening untill 4...Nxe4?? you should assume that black will never make this move (unless he has his eyes closed and is using the Force!) because aside from 5.Nxf7 it also would allow 5.Nxe4 ...Black is a knight down for a mere pawn.