taking rating points would be too mean for me to do to you. you beat up on too many lower rated players to be able to beat me or even up a good challenge.
Originally posted by kmac27 taking rating points would be too mean for me to do to you. you beat up on too many lower rated players to be able to beat me or even up a good challenge.
? I don't play low rated players. In general their average is likely lower than mine since I played them and won to get up to my rating, and I play them in tournament games. But I don't choose who I play, my clan leader and the tournament set up does. Find a real insult next time. For example, if I had lost against a 1200 to the Hammerschlag, then you could make fun of me for that.
EDIT:BTW I have 3 in progress against a 2000+ player - is that "beating up on lower rated players"?
that 1200 player would wipe the floor with you i gaurintee it. and i gaurintee that if you played me 10 times you would lose all 10 of them without a doubt
Originally posted by kmac27 that 1200 player would wipe the floor with you i gaurintee it. and i gaurintee that if you played me 10 times you would lose all 10 of them without a doubt
The ratings suggest otherwise.
CMS:- Peak: 1571
KMC:- Peak: 1681
so....Only a 110pts between both your peaks.
a 100pts rating diff rarely equals a 10-0 slate.
...if you did play 10 games, I should imagine the score would be much closer to 6-4 or 7-3...but not 10-0
9w should have been g3 and then:
9b Qxe4
10w Qd2e2
Black can then scrafice both queens resulting in major material gain of the White Rook, or, ignore this and play around.
Playing chess online is nothing like playing real chess, but - I love the way these forum-dwellers love to flame and faff about things... 'I'd beat you 10 - nil...' Ha ha ha. Wonderful stuff...
Oh dear, my mum's calling me - it's chicken dippers tongiht.
A great sacrifice or dumb luck?
16 Sep '06 02:43
Back to Top