Go back
A Jonny Hector game

A Jonny Hector game

Only Chess

2 edits

A game of Jonny Hector's that I thought I would share. There are no comments from me because this is way over my head! I have no idea what is going on, but it is amazing.

Jonny Hector vs Per Vernersson, Swedish Championship 2001.

  • 8
  • a
  • 7
  • b
  • 6
  • c
  • 5
  • d
  • 4
  • e
  • 3
  • f
  • 2
  • g
  • 1
  • h
1.e4c6
2.d4d5
3.Nd2dxe4
4.Nxe4Nd7
5.Ng5Ngf6
6.Bc4e6
7.Qe2Nb6
8.Bd3h6
9.N5f3Nbd7
10.Bd2c5
11.O-O-Oa6
12.Nh4Qc7
13.Ngf3cxd4
14.Ng6Rg8
15.Nxd4Nc5
16.Bf4Qb6
17.Nxf8Kxf8
18.Bc4Bd7
19.Nf5Bb5
20.Qe3Ne8
21.Rd6Bc6
22.Bxe6fxe6
23.Rxe6Na4
24.Rf6

0


      I'll give a bash at noting it up.
      Hector, Sax and Vanganian games are always worth playing over.

      J. Hector - P. Vernersson Sweden 2001

      • 8
      • a
      • 7
      • b
      • 6
      • c
      • 5
      • d
      • 4
      • e
      • 3
      • f
      • 2
      • g
      • 1
      • h
      1.e4c6
      2.d4d5
      3.Nd2dxe4
      4.Nxe4Nd7
      5.Ng5Ngf6
      6.Bc4e6
      7.Qe2Nb6
      8.Bd3h6
      9.N5f3Nbd7
      10.Bd2c5
      11.O-O-Oa6
      12.Nh4Qc7
      13.Ngf3cxd4
      14.Ng6Rg8
      15.Nxd4Nc5
      16.Bf4Qb6
      17.Nxf8Kxf8
      18.Bc4Bd7
      19.Nf5Bb5
      20.Qe3Ne8
      21.Rd6Bc6
      22.Bxe6fxe6
      23.Rxe6Na4
      24.Rf6gxf6
      25.Qe7

      0


          Now we look at the original Knight sacrifice.


          • 8
          • a
          • 7
          • b
          • 6
          • c
          • 5
          • d
          • 4
          • e
          • 3
          • f
          • 2
          • g
          • 1
          • h
          1.fxg6Bxg6
          2.Ke7Nxd4
          3.e5Bb4
          4.Nc5Qc4
          5.exd4Bxc5
          6.Kd8Qxd4
          7.Bd7Bb6

          -1


          And finally Game No 8632718 which was mentioned in the notes to the first game.

          WhiteHorses - kapatidnapogi RHP 2012

          • 8
          • a
          • 7
          • b
          • 6
          • c
          • 5
          • d
          • 4
          • e
          • 3
          • f
          • 2
          • g
          • 1
          • h
          1.e4c6
          2.d4d5
          3.Nb1c3dxe4
          4.Nc3xe4Nb8d7
          5.Bf1c4Ng8f6
          6.Ne4g5e6
          7.Qd1e2Bf8e7
          8.Ng5xf7Ke8xf7
          9.Qe2xe6Kf7g6
          10.Bc4d3

          0

              Vote Up
              Vote Down

              Originally posted by greenpawn34
              [b]I'll give a bash at noting it up.
              Hector, Sax and Vanganian games are always worth playing over.
              Thumbs up and worth repeating! As soon as I saw Hector's name in the title, I opened this thread immediately.

              He plays with energy and has his own unique style. A book of his best games would be a great read.

              Vote Up
              Vote Down

              Thanks for the notes. BTW, the pgn leading this thread gives the result as 0-1; when I saw the result I was puzzled (mate in two--even I can see that far ahead). Maybe the pgn should be corrected.

              Is anyone at the forum familiar with games of Julius/Gyula Breyer? He had a similar style, it seems to me--very unusual ideas.

              Vote Up
              Vote Down

              Originally posted by moonbus
              Thanks for the notes. BTW, the pgn leading this thread gives the result as 0-1; when I saw the result I was puzzled (mate in two--even I can see that far ahead). Maybe the pgn should be corrected.

              Is anyone at the forum familiar with games of Julius/Gyula Breyer? He had a similar style, it seems to me--very unusual ideas.
              Breyer features prominently in Reti's Modern Ideas in Chess. He may well have been the first truly hypermodern player.

              Vote Up
              Vote Down

              Originally posted by Paul Leggett
              Breyer features prominently in Reti's Modern Ideas in Chess. He may well have been the first truly hypermodern player.
              "After 1.P-K4 whites game is in its last throes" Julius Breyer

              Vote Up
              Vote Down

              "After 1.P-K4 whites game is in its last throes"

              After quoting this in Modern Chess Ideas Reti added:

              Credo quia absurdum

              Which translates to "I believe because it is absurd."

              Vote Up
              Vote Down

              Thanks for the lead on Breyer. Somehow I have not seen and played through these games. Really really difficult and interesting.

              The first one I looked at on chessgames - this comes up -

              • 8
              • a
              • 7
              • b
              • 6
              • c
              • 5
              • d
              • 4
              • e
              • 3
              • f
              • 2
              • g
              • 1
              • h
              1.e4c6
              2.d4d5
              3.Nc3dxe4
              4.Nxe4Nf6
              5.Qd3Nbd7
              6.Nxf6Nxf6
              7.Nf3Bg4
              8.Ne5Bh5
              9.Bd2e6
              10.f3Nd7
              11.O-O-OQc7
              12.Kb1

              0


                  So from this position, why is it that black should not play NxN, and after pxN, QxN?

                  Thus -
                  • 8
                  • a
                  • 7
                  • b
                  • 6
                  • c
                  • 5
                  • d
                  • 4
                  • e
                  • 3
                  • f
                  • 2
                  • g
                  • 1
                  • h
                  1.e4c6
                  2.d4d5
                  3.Nc3dxe4
                  4.Nxe4Nf6
                  5.Qd3Nbd7
                  6.Nxf6Nxf6
                  7.Nf3Bg4
                  8.Ne5Bh5
                  9.Bd2e6
                  10.f3Nd7
                  11.O-O-OQc7
                  12.Kb1Nxe5
                  13.dxe5Qxe5

                  0


                      I see that if the bishop on d2 was not there, then Qd7 is mate. I see that the bishop has a free move because of that threat. The problem is that black has Qd5, and if the white Q goes somewhere else the R on d1 is hanging. What am I missing? In the actual game black played 0-0-0 instead of taking the e-pawn

                      2 edits

                      Hi Exuma

                      You have to weigh these things up OTB very carefully.
                      An attacking player would offer that pawn without much thought.
                      They have a history of offering such pawns (who was White?...Infact who were the players?)
                      he knows the coming defence is difficult for Black.
                      He will get play for that pawn.

                      Black may have just rejected it because he saw the difficulties and
                      after 0-0-0 theatened to take it.
                      (The threat very often being stronger than the execution.)

                      He may not have picked his through the maze and decided it was not worth a pawn.

                      (Also, I don't know, it may be a theorectical pawn sac by White.)

                      However Lasker (and we will meet him again in a minute) writes
                      any centre pawn is always worth a bit of trouble.

                      All these maxims, quotes and rules of thumb.
                      Each one appears to have a counter rule of thumb.
                      Is it any wonder we are running around like headless chickens.

                      Winter writes that he once thought for ages (35 minutes if I recall)
                      before saccing a piece v Lasker. Lasker ignored it and replied within a
                      minute.

                      After the game Winter asked why did you not take the piece. Lasker replied.

                      "If a good player offers a piece sacrifice after 35 minutes thought it must
                      be good. You can keep the piece I'll keep the 35 minutes."

                      Or words to that effect, I cannot remember it word for word. Lasker won.

                      So let us have a quick look at what perhaps Black saw...
                      (though I think they just said "No Thank You." without much thought.)

                      • 8
                      • a
                      • 7
                      • b
                      • 6
                      • c
                      • 5
                      • d
                      • 4
                      • e
                      • 3
                      • f
                      • 2
                      • g
                      • 1
                      • h
                      1.Kb1Nxe5
                      2.dxe5Qxe5
                      3.Bg5Qd5
                      4.Qxd5exd5
                      5.Rxd5f6

                      0


                      This is the other line the Black player would have to look at.

                      • 8
                      • a
                      • 7
                      • b
                      • 6
                      • c
                      • 5
                      • d
                      • 4
                      • e
                      • 3
                      • f
                      • 2
                      • g
                      • 1
                      • h
                      1.Kb1Nxe5
                      2.dxe5Qxe5
                      3.Bc3Qd5
                      4.Qe2Qc5
                      5.Qd2Qd5
                      6.Qe1Qc5
                      7.Qd2Qd5
                      8.Qe1

                      0

                      1 edit
                      Vote Up
                      Vote Down

                      Originally posted by greenpawn34
                      I'll give a bash at noting it up.
                      Hector, Sax and Vanganian games are always worth playing over.

                      [b]J. Hector - P. Vernersson
                      Sweden 2001

                      [pgn]
                      1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 {It very rarely matters if you play this or 3.Nc3 Black usually plays....} 3... dxe4 {....this to either move.} 4. Nxe4 Nd7 {4...Bf5 is more popular but the text has it's band e7 8. Ng5xf7 Ke8xf7 9. Qe2xe6 Kf7g6 10. Bc4d3[/pgn][/b]
                      In that opening, what is wrong with stopping that whole affair with 3 ed, cd and then 4 c4 making it more like a queen's gambit? That works the same against the french also. Is there some underlying fault with that system?

                      1 edit
                      Vote Up
                      Vote Down

                      Originally posted by greenpawn34
                      Hi Exuma

                      You have to weigh these things up OTB very carefully.
                      An attacking player would offer that pawn without much thought.
                      They have a history of offering such pawns (who was White?...Infact who were the players?)
                      he knows the coming defence is difficult for Black.
                      He will get play for that pawn.
                      Ah my apologies - the game was Gyula Breyer v Ziolo 1911. Thanks for the notes - that Bg5 is crafty
                      Here is the full game -

                      • 8
                      • a
                      • 7
                      • b
                      • 6
                      • c
                      • 5
                      • d
                      • 4
                      • e
                      • 3
                      • f
                      • 2
                      • g
                      • 1
                      • h
                      1.e4c6
                      2.d4d5
                      3.Nc3dxe4
                      4.Nxe4Nf6
                      5.Qd3Nbd7
                      6.Nxf6Nxf6
                      7.Nf3Bg4
                      8.Ne5Bh5
                      9.Bd2e6
                      10.f3Nd7
                      11.O-O-OQc7
                      12.Kb1O-O-O
                      13.Qc3Bd6
                      14.Nxd7Rxd7
                      15.Be2Bg6
                      16.g3Rhd8
                      17.Be3Kb8
                      18.Rd2Rc8
                      19.Rhd1Qd8
                      20.Ka1Qf8
                      21.a3Ka8
                      22.Qb3Bc7
                      23.Qa4Bb6
                      24.Bd3Rcd8
                      25.Bxg6hxg6
                      26.Rd3Rd5
                      27.c4R5d7
                      28.Qb3Qe7
                      29.f4Qf6
                      30.d5cxd5
                      31.Bxb6axb6
                      32.Qxb6d4
                      33.c5e5
                      34.fxe5Qxe5
                      35.c6bxc6
                      36.Rb3Qc7
                      37.Qa6Qa7
                      38.Qxc6Rb7
                      39.Re1d3
                      40.Re8Rxe8
                      41.Qxe8Qb8
                      42.Qxb8Kxb8
                      43.Rxb7Kxb7
                      44.Kb1Kc6
                      45.Kc1Kc5
                      46.Kd2Kc4
                      47.a4g5
                      48.a5

                      0

                          Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.