Hello, I played as white. I started to play this game few months ago when I was in much better shape. Now I didn't play for some time and I was very confused altough I think I didn't stand bad so I resigned. I think white had better start. Should I exploit it somehow ?
The line 6. Nxg4 Nxg4 7. e4 is very interesting to me. It grabs the bishop pair and opens the position up, although your line is very convincing as well.
11. Qc2!?, attacking the pawn immediately is possibly more accurate than 11. e3, since he either has to play 11..Ne7 and block his Bf8, or dislodge his king with 11..Kf7.
Why 13. Bd2? Is it not better to play something like 13. Qc2! Kf7 14. Bd3 Ne7 15. Rh3! intending 16. Rf3+.
I didn't use any engine for this, so I may be missing something, but it's food for thought at least.
Originally posted by wakchessdragon Hello, I played as white. I started to play this game few months ago when I was in much better shape. Now I didn't play for some time and I was very confused altough I think I didn't stand bad so I resigned. I think white had better start. Should I exploit it somehow ?
Originally posted by wakchessdragon Hello, I played as white. I started to play this game few months ago when I was in much better shape. Now I didn't play for some time and I was very confused altough I think I didn't stand bad so I resigned. I think white had better start. Should I exploit it somehow ?
Yes. You've created a weakness on g6 (and more generally in the kingside pawn cover) and then do absolutely nothing about attacking it. You've also got an open file for your rook (Rh3-f3) that you are not using. Once you created that weakness, every subsequent move should have been directed toward attacking it in some fashion. You have a nice diagonal from c2 to g6 that two pieces (queen and bishop) could use, and the support of the rook in controlling f7 would then be decisive. Just my two cents.