Go back
A nice conversation.

A nice conversation.

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cmsMaster
Oh, no I'm too lazy right now. But yeah, I don't really exclude people - unless you're an engine user...Although I haven't checked any of my members out for it.
I dislike cheaters and engine users. I like creative players and i like aggression.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by pawnfondler
ratings are irrelevant, if your 1300 i will beat you, if your 2000 ill try to beat you. as long as it doesnt look like youll cheat ill take you on.
They give a pretty good indication of how good someone is, and there are plenty of good reasons I don't allow 1300/1400 scrubs to challenge me - I don't want to waste my time.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Diet Coke
Running away.......:-)
I'll tell you what...I'll make an exception for you. If you get to 1549 I'll accept your challenge - good luck!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cmsMaster
I'll tell you what...I'll make an exception for you. If you get to 1549 I'll accept your challenge - good luck!
Dude no!

That would require me to try.

I just want a FEW interesting games.

To go with my 100 'other' games.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Diet Coke
Dude no!

That would require me to try.

I just want a FEW interesting games.

To go with my 100 'other' games.
Well, if you're good enough to beat me than you should be good enough to hit that level, if not then go away.

I'm sure the "I can so beat you" argument works against 14 year olds, but it won't work against me. No 1550 no game. In fact I think 1550 is quite lenient.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Diet Coke
Dude no!

That would require me to try.

I just want a FEW interesting games.

To go with my 100 'other' games.
lol , why do you play then?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by pawnfondler
lol , why do you play then?
That's my point, they have no answer for that. I don't need to hear excuses, your rating is what it is.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cmsMaster
That's my point, they have no answer for that. I don't need to hear excuses, your rating is what it is.
well that is true, unless your building it up from 1200. i made the mistake of not trying to tackle any 1500s when i was provisional. so now its baby steps up t owhere i should be.

Vote Up
Vote Down

plus i didnt take the site seriously and timed out of some early games.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cmsMaster
Well, if you're good enough to beat me than you should be good enough to hit that level, if not then go away.

I'm sure the "I can so beat you" argument works against 14 year olds, but it won't work against me. No 1550 no game. In fact I think 1550 is quite lenient.
Making mutliple moves in a minute on different games will hinder anyones ability.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by pawnfondler
lol , why do you play then?
I get bored of waiting for games.

I basically want 6 serious games and 100 or so non serious games.

I don't give a crap about ratings.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Diet Coke
Making mutliple moves in a minute on different games will hinder anyones ability.
I don't need excuses - it isn't my fault that you suck, and don't even try to pawn it off on time either.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Diet Coke
Making mutliple moves in a minute on different games will hinder anyones ability.
accept what you can deal with then.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Diet Coke
I get bored of waiting for games.

I basically want 6 serious games and 100 or so non serious games.

I don't give a crap about ratings.
What is 89 BCF translated to FIDE?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cmsMaster
What is 89 BCF translated to FIDE?
Not a lot.