09 Mar 07
Let's say you find a public game of interest that ends in a draw. There are still several pieces on the board and it looks to be a complex posiition. So you run it thru an engine and it shows a definite advantage for one side after 1 to 2 hours of analysis.
Should you message the person with the advantage and paste the analysis to let him see, or just let it go? I don't know how they would take it-- constructive criticism or someone just trying to show them up; myself-- I would be glad someone noticed the game and would appreciate trying to help me.
09 Mar 07
Originally posted by Crushing DayPersonally if it took 1 to 2 hours of computer analysis, I am not sufficiently skilled to benefit in most cases and would not care to hear about it. If you could explain a battle plan to win the game that I overlooked, I'd be happy to hear about it. But you probably would need to consider the players likely ability to assimulate your critique. Telling a player rated 1000 how to win a tight end-game involving intricate execution would probably not benefit anyone.
Let's say you find a public game of interest that ends in a draw. There are still several pieces on the board and it looks to be a complex posiition. So you run it thru an engine and it shows a definite advantage for one side after 1 to 2 hours of analysis.
Should you message the person with the advantage and paste the analysis to let him see, or j ...[text shortened]... up; myself-- I would be glad someone noticed the game and would appreciate trying to help me.