02 Jun '06 15:25>
Hi guys!
I was recently reading the arguement that a king and bishop cannot checkmate a single king, etc. which I totally agree with.
However, someone said that it may be possible with a pawn. Could someone please demonstrate this, possibly by a FEN?
My next question... can this be done with TWO bishops? I am very tempted to guess that yes, it is possible, but, again, I am not sure.
Next question! Is there a definite way of determining whether a game is winnable?
From my knowledge, I know that these are possibilities of mate during an endgame:
1.Two rooks (dead easy)
2.Rook and queen (even easier)
3.Queen and king (easy, but takes a bit of practice)
4.Rook and king (can be done, but takes some time)
5.King and pawn (force the queening of the pawn)
I was recently reading the arguement that a king and bishop cannot checkmate a single king, etc. which I totally agree with.
However, someone said that it may be possible with a pawn. Could someone please demonstrate this, possibly by a FEN?
My next question... can this be done with TWO bishops? I am very tempted to guess that yes, it is possible, but, again, I am not sure.
Next question! Is there a definite way of determining whether a game is winnable?
From my knowledge, I know that these are possibilities of mate during an endgame:
1.Two rooks (dead easy)
2.Rook and queen (even easier)
3.Queen and king (easy, but takes a bit of practice)
4.Rook and king (can be done, but takes some time)
5.King and pawn (force the queening of the pawn)