Originally posted by GoshenJust post it. You will get your analysis and then it will float off the first page. If everyone asked what they should do about posting a game the forum would still get cluttered no? The forum gets cluttered anyway so no worries mate.
Hi all. I actually need some of my games analysed but I was wondering...if every RHP player created a thread for every game they want analysed, the forums would quickly get congested. So, what do I do?
Theres a thread titled players should submit their finished games for analysis but i doubt if any1 goes there anymore.
Originally posted by GoshenWell 15.f4 catches my attention but I haven't looked very far. Something like 15...exf4 16.Rxg7+ Kxg7 17.Rg1+ Kh8 18.Qd4+ but that doesn't work because of 19...f6 but maybe there is a way to make the idea work.
Okay here it is. I know its no good posting won games, but I would like to know if I could have even done better. Or if I gave him a chance to counter.
Qd2h6 g6 18. Bc4xd5 Ra8b8 19. Rd1g1 b5 20. Rg2xg6 hxg6 21. Rg1xg6 1-0
Originally posted by greenpawn34Thanks a lot Geoff. So you can see so much after just running through? I wonder what your detailed analysis would look like. Well as you said the moves after the queen sac aren't forced. I'm not as risky or as good as you...yet.
Ran through this.
Bet White can pull a plus with the psuedo Queen sac 9.Nxd4
instead of 9.Qd3.
9.Nxd4 Bxd1 10.Bb5+ Ke7 11.Nd5 mate was seen within seconds.
Not forced but after all captures can see White Knight on d5 - pawn on
d6 and Bishop on f8.
Over cauctious wrap up - Rd1-g1 - not needed - 19.Rxg6+
does it sraight away. Poor ...[text shortened]... on g4. so have tempo to develop.
Black look after your King.
White sharpen up your tactics.