1. Joined
    08 Aug '05
    Moves
    509
    30 Dec '05 11:02
    I thought I might share this (very dubious) idea I faced online against a number of Alekhine players.

    It goes 1. e4 Nf6 2. e5 d5 (??!) - yes I know!!

    After 3. exf6 (seems logical enough) then Black plays 3... e5 (?!) - is this what Black is trying to achieve with this piece gambit?
  2. Belfast
    Joined
    12 Nov '05
    Moves
    1780
    30 Dec '05 11:32
    Originally posted by Oddjob291
    I thought I might share this (very dubious) idea I faced online against a number of Alekhine players.

    It goes 1. e4 Nf6 2. e5 d5 (??!) - yes I know!!

    After 3. exf6 (seems logical enough) then Black plays 3... e5 (?!) - is this what Black is trying to achieve with this piece gambit?
    Well he played it so I imagine that it is, yes.

    Doesn't seem worth the piece to get two centre pawns out. Especially as vital a piece as the KKt.
  3. Joined
    14 Oct '01
    Moves
    20676
    30 Dec '05 15:56
    Originally posted by Oddjob291
    I thought I might share this (very dubious) idea I faced online against a number of Alekhine players.

    It goes 1. e4 Nf6 2. e5 d5 (??!) - yes I know!!

    After 3. exf6 (seems logical enough) then Black plays 3... e5 (?!) - is this what Black is trying to achieve with this piece gambit?
    nope...that's crap...it would never be played by a good player
  4. São Paulo, Brazil
    Joined
    28 Dec '05
    Moves
    7191
    30 Dec '05 17:22
    That's just awful. 😛
  5. Standard memberNatural Science
    blunderer of pawns
    Rhode (not an)Island
    Joined
    17 Apr '04
    Moves
    24785
    30 Dec '05 18:23
    "Dubious" is putting it very gently. It's utterly terrible.
  6. Joined
    05 Feb '06
    Moves
    2712
    17 Feb '06 00:11
    Alekhine never played that move
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree