1. Standard memberbosintang
    perpetualEditMonkey
    Nova Scotia
    Joined
    14 Jan '06
    Moves
    10177
    18 Jan '11 04:085 edits
    Great example of fighting for the draw from the Wijk aan Zee tournament happening this week:

    Vachier Lagrave, M.-Wang Hao
    Move 32 - Black to play




    White is threatening Ng5 followed by Qh7# and Black looks like his position is hopeless. How does he save the half-point?


  2. Standard memberMarinkatomb
    wotagr8game
    tbc
    Joined
    18 Feb '04
    Moves
    61941
    18 Jan '11 04:16
    Originally posted by bosintang
    Great example of fighting for the draw from the Wijk aan Zee tournament happening this week:

    [b]Vachier Lagrave, M.-Wang Hao
    Move 32 - Black to play


    [fen]2r3k1/1p2Bpp1/p3p1p1/bq1pP3/1n1P2PQ/1R3N2/1P3PKP/8 b - - 0 1[/fen]

    White is threatening Ng5 followed by Qe7# and Black looks like his position is hopeless. How does he save the half-point? ...[text shortened]... Nd3 33. Rxb5 33... Nf4+ 34. Kg3 34... Ne2+ 35. Kh3 Nf4+ 36. Kg3 Ne2+ 37. Kg2 Nf4+ 1/2-1/2[/pgn][/b]
    Wow! Genius 😀
  3. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    18 Jan '11 12:091 edit
    Wonderful.

    Might make perpetuals from RHP a future theme for a Blog.
  4. Donationketchuplover
    Isolated Pawn
    Wisconsin USA
    Joined
    09 Dec '01
    Moves
    71174
    18 Jan '11 13:45
    Apparently white missed 32.Bf6 winning
  5. Standard memberbosintang
    perpetualEditMonkey
    Nova Scotia
    Joined
    14 Jan '06
    Moves
    10177
    18 Jan '11 20:423 edits
    Hey GP,

    Perpetual checks is a great blog theme, but don't forget that other great way to save the half-point:

    Enik-Eiffel Correspondence 1957
    White to play



    This position is from "Chess Tactics" by Paul Littlewood. It's by far and away my favourite chess tactics book.
  6. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    18 Jan '11 20:45
    Originally posted by bosintang
    Hey GP,

    Perpetual checks is a great blog theme, but don't forget that other great way to save the half-point:

    [b]Enik-Eiffel Correspondence 1957

    White to play

    [pgn]
    [Result "1/2-1/2"]
    [FEN "2r3k1/R5p1/6Pp/5p2/3p1P2/4nP1q/5Q2/6K1 w - - 0 1"]
    1. Ra8 Rxa8 2. Qxe3 dxe3 {Stalemate!}
    1/2-1/2 [/pgn]

    This position is from "Chess Tactics" by Paul Littlewood. It's by far and away my favourite chess tactics book.[/b]
    Except its not forced. 2...Ra1+
  7. Standard memberbosintang
    perpetualEditMonkey
    Nova Scotia
    Joined
    14 Jan '06
    Moves
    10177
    18 Jan '11 20:48
    Sorry, I corrected the PGN. I missed it myself when I made the PGN! Haha.
  8. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    18 Jan '11 20:513 edits
    Originally posted by bosintang
    Sorry, I corrected the PGN. I missed it myself when I made the PGN! Haha.
    oh now thats better
  9. Standard memberbosintang
    perpetualEditMonkey
    Nova Scotia
    Joined
    14 Jan '06
    Moves
    10177
    18 Jan '11 20:531 edit
    nm. We're all caught up. 🙂
  10. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    18 Jan '11 20:543 edits
    Originally posted by bosintang
    Hey GP,

    Perpetual checks is a great blog theme, but don't forget that other great way to save the half-point:

    [b]Enik-Eiffel Correspondence 1957

    White to play

    [pgn]
    [Result "1/2-1/2"]
    [FEN "2r3k1/R5p1/6Pp/5p2/3p1P2/4nP1q/5Q2/6K1 w - - 0 1"]
    1. Ra8 Rxa8 2. Qxa2 {!!} 2... Rxa2 {Stalemate!}
    1/2-1/2 [/pgn]

    This position is from "Chess Tactics" by Paul Littlewood. It's by far and away my favourite chess tactics book.[/b]
    Whoops that doesn't work. I tried to make teh Qxe3 idea work and it failed.
  11. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    18 Jan '11 21:01
    I'm sure the lads on here won't let me down.

    I'm expecting to see a perpetual check that is NOT a perpetual check.
    Players resigning when they had a perpetual or a player taking a
    perpetual when they had a mate instead.

    Looking forward to the hunt.
  12. Joined
    29 Sep '10
    Moves
    36220
    18 Jan '11 21:42
    Anyone,
    Continuing the next move in the simulation there from bosintang's first post, would it still be perpetual check if the white king plays 'Kh1'? I think if white plays 'Kh1' next, then black would eventually return to a hopeless situation because white can also have its knight block any potential threat from the black rook which would be a dangerous thing for black to do at any rate because of the position of the white rook...well that's how i see it, did I miss something?...
  13. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    18 Jan '11 21:46
    Originally posted by Iere man
    Anyone,
    Continuing the next move in the simulation there from bosintang's first post, would it still be perpetual check if the white king plays 'Kh1'? I think if white plays 'Kh1' next, then black would eventually return to a hopeless situation because white can also have its knight block any potential threat from the black rook which would be a dangerous ...[text shortened]... use of the position of the white rook...well that's how i see it, did I miss something?...
    1.Kh1 Rc1+ 2.Ng1 Ne2
  14. Joined
    29 Sep '10
    Moves
    36220
    18 Jan '11 22:001 edit
    thx tom, but are we absoultely sure it won't allow white a free move or something to neutralize or delay this new threat?..like moving the white queen to protect the white knight for instance...
  15. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    18 Jan '11 22:061 edit
    Originally posted by Iere man
    thx tom, but are we absoultely sure it won't allow white a free move or something to neutralize or delay this new threat?..like moving the white queen to protect the white knight for instance...
    The only square the queen can go to protect the knight is under attack by black's knight so 3.Qg3 Nxg3+ and game over.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree